Cited by 47Trypanosoma species research and implicationsVector-borne infectious diseasesHelminth infection and control

Response of four indigenous cattle breeds to natural tsetse and trypanosomosis challenge in the Ghibe valley of Ethiopia

Lemecha, H., Mulatu, W., Hussein, I., Rege, E., Tekle, T., Abdicho, S., Ayalew, W.·2006·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

A comparative study on the response of four indigenous cattle breeds of Ethiopia, namely Abigar, Horro, Sheko and Gurage, to natural challenge of trypanosomosis in the Tolley-Gullele area of the Ghibe valley has been undertaken from August 2000 until August 2004. Fifty female yearlings each of Horro, Sheko and Abigar and 31 of the Gurage were purchased from their natural habitats and introduced in to medium to high tsetse-trypanosomosis challenge area of the Ghibe valley. While the natural habitats of first three breeds are naturally infested with tsetse flies and trypanosomosis, that of the Gurage is known to be very minimal, if any, and hence the Gurage breed was used in this study as the known susceptible breed. During the study animal health, production performance and tsetse fly situation were monitored monthly. The Sheko breed has manifested very significantly (p<0.001) high overall average packed cell volume (PCV) values (25%) compared to that of Abigar (24%), Horro (23%) and Gurage (22%). It also had the lowest mean trypanosome prevalence rate of 9% against 23% of Horro, 26% of Abigar and 27% of Gurage, and the least number of Berenil treatments (1.36) compared to Abigar (4.0), Horro (4.6) and Gurage (6.7). While the Abigar manifested high sensitivity and frequent death to PCV depression, the Horro showed strong resilience to PCV depression and better response to Berenil treatment assistance. At this stage the Sheko breed was also found to be equal to the other breeds…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.04.035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 33 · Cited by 47

Authors
Lemecha, H., Mulatu, W., Hussein, I., Rege, E., Tekle, T., Abdicho, S., & Ayalew, W.
Affiliations
International Livestock Research Institute (KE)
Corresponding author
Ayalew, W.
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
141
Issue
1-2
Pages
165-176
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968688547
Cited by
47
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Trypanosoma species research and implications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
Keywords
tsetse flies, trypanosomiasis, indigenous cattle breeds, Gurage, natural challenge, hematocrit, trypanosome prevalence, breed resistance, reproductive performance
MeSH terms
Animals, Breeding, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Disease Susceptibility, Environment, Ethiopia, Female, Hematocrit, Insect Vectors, Trypanosoma, Trypanosomiasis, Tsetse Flies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review