One hundred years of poliovirus pathogenesis
Open accessAbstract
Poliovirus was first isolated nearly 100 years ago in a landmark experiment that established the viral etiology of poliomyelitis. This discovery stimulated investigation of the pathogenesis of poliomyelitis in many laboratories. Nearly 50 years later, when two effective poliovirus vaccines were developed, the impetus to study poliovirus pathogenesis waned. The identification of the cell receptor for poliovirus, CD155, and its use in the development of transgenic mice susceptible to poliovirus revived interest in understanding how the virus causes disease. Experiments in CD155 transgenic mice have provided new information on the initial sites of virus replication in the host, how the virus spreads to the central nervous system through the blood and by axonal transport, the determinants of viral tropism, and the basis for the attenuation phenotype of the Sabin vaccine strains. Despite these advances, our understanding of poliovirus pathogenesis is still incomplete. The dilemma is not how to answer the remaining questions, but whether there will be sufficient time to do so before global eradication of poliomyelitis leads to cessation of research on the disease.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 82 · Cited by 322
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [62]62. Howley, P., Knipe, D. (Eds.), Fields virology, vol. 1. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 685 -722.
- Authors
- Racaniello, V. R.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Racaniello, Vincent R.
- Venue
- Virology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 344
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-16
- ISSN
- 0042-6822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069750821
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Virology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
- Keywords
- poliovirus, poliomyelitis, viral pathogenesis, CD155, poliovirus receptor, transgenic mice, viral tropism, axonal transport, central nervous system infection, viral replication sites, polio eradication
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Central Nervous System, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Transgenic, Poliomyelitis, Receptors, Virus, Virulence, Virus Replication, Poliovirus, Poliovirus Vaccines, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review