The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the enormous diversity of bacteriophages: The tailed phages that infect the bacterial family Enterobacteriaceae
Open accessAbstract
Bacteriophages are the predominant biological entity on the planet. The recent explosion of sequence information has made estimates of their diversity possible. We describe the genomic comparison of 337 fully sequenced tailed phages isolated on 18 genera and 31 species of bacteria in the Enterobacteriaceae. These phages were largely unambiguously grouped into 56 diverse clusters (32 lytic and 24 temperate) that have syntenic similarity over >50% of the genomes within each cluster, but substantially less sequence similarity between clusters. Most clusters naturally break into sets of more closely related subclusters, 78% of which are correlated with their host genera. The largest groups of related phages are superclusters united by genome synteny to lambda (81 phages) and T7 (51 phages). This study forms a robust framework for understanding diversity and evolutionary relationships of existing tailed phages, for relating newly discovered phages and for determining host/phage relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Federhen, S. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1178 · Cited by 1,436 · cited 1×
“In addition, the phages analyzed here were isolated on 18 different host Enterobacteriaceae genera, and at present this family currently contains 74 genera (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Brow ser/wwwtax.cgi?id = 543) (Federhen, 2012).”
BackgroundNCBI Reference Sequences: current status, policy and new initiatives
Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T., Klimke, W., & Maglott, D. R. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn721 · Cited by 736 · cited 1×
“We searched the extant sequence database at NCBI (Benson et al., 2013; Pruitt et al., 2009) for tailed phages that infect bacteria in the family Enterobacteriaceae.”
MethodAntibiotic treatment expands the resistance reservoir and ecological network of the phage metagenome
Modi, S. R., Lee, H. H., Spina, C. S., & Collins, J. J. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12212 · Cited by 542
Cited by
Phage diversity, genomics and phylogeny
Dion, M. B., Oechslin, F., & Moineau, S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0311-5 · Cited by 960
How to Name and Classify Your Phage: An Informal Guide
Adriaenssens, E., & Brister, J. R. (2017) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v9040070 · Cited by 477
Pope, W. H., Bowman, C. A., Russell, D. A., Jacobs-Sera, D., Asai, D. J., Cresawn, S. G., Jacobs, W. R., Hendrix, R. W., Lawrence, J. G., Hatfull, G. F., et al. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.06416 · Cited by 310
Bacteriophage evolution differs by host, lifestyle and genome
Mavrich, T. N., & Hatfull, G. F. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.112 · Cited by 294
vConTACT: an iVirus tool to classify double-stranded DNA viruses that infect Archaea and Bacteria
Bolduc, B., Jang, H. B., Doulcier, G., You, Z.-Q., Roux, S., & Sullivan, M. B. (2017) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.3243 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Grose, J. H., & Casjens, S. R.
- Venue
- Virology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 468-470
- Pages
- 421-443
- ISSN
- 0042-6822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992141349
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the enormous diversity of bacteriophages: The tailed phages that infect the bacterial family Enterobacteriaceae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.virol.2014.08.024
- The paper
- Grose, J. H., & Casjens, S. R. (2014). Understanding the enormous diversity of bacteriophages: The tailed phages that infect the bacterial family Enterobacteriaceae. Virology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2014.08.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.