Cited by 287Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

On the role of frontal eye field in guiding attention and saccades

Open access
Schall, Jeffrey D.·2004·Vision Research

Abstract

The neural bases of shifting attention and directing gaze were investigated in macaque monkeys performing a singleton search that required a prosaccade, antisaccade, or no saccade cued by the shape of the singleton. In prosaccade trials, most neurons in frontal eye field selected the location of the singleton that was also the end point of the saccade. In antisaccade trials, most neurons selected the singleton followed by selection of the endpoint of the saccade. Other neurons selected only the endpoint of the saccade in antisaccade trials. When no saccade was produced, many of the first type of neuron still selected the singleton, and many but not all of both types of neurons later selected the stimulus opposite the singleton even though no saccade was produced. These patterns of activity are consistent with the hypotheses that covert shifts of attention can occur without saccade production and that FEF contributes to covert as well as overt orienting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.visres.2003.10.025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The frontal eye field contains neurons with shifting receptive fields.

    “One brain area that contains neurons with this property is the frontal eye field (FEF), a cortical structure that is involved in vision and eye-movement control42.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [42]

  • At least some of the CD for shifting receptive fields arises from a pathway that ascends from the midbrain to the frontal eye field.

    “At least some of this CD arises from a pathway that ascends from the midbrain40,41 to the frontal eye field, a cortical structure that is involved in visual processing and eye-movement control42.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [42]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 287

Authors
Schall, J. D.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Schall, Jeffrey D.
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
44
Issue
12
Pages
1453-1467
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136639539
Cited by
287
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (R01 EY08890, P30-EY08126, R01EY008890, P30EY008126)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD015052)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
frontal eye field, saccades, covert attention, attentional shift, prosaccades, antisaccades, gaze direction, singletons, neuronal activity, macaque
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Color Perception, Cues, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Eye, Macaca radiata, Neurons, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Saccades, Visual Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review