On the role of frontal eye field in guiding attention and saccades
Open accessAbstract
The neural bases of shifting attention and directing gaze were investigated in macaque monkeys performing a singleton search that required a prosaccade, antisaccade, or no saccade cued by the shape of the singleton. In prosaccade trials, most neurons in frontal eye field selected the location of the singleton that was also the end point of the saccade. In antisaccade trials, most neurons selected the singleton followed by selection of the endpoint of the saccade. Other neurons selected only the endpoint of the saccade in antisaccade trials. When no saccade was produced, many of the first type of neuron still selected the singleton, and many but not all of both types of neurons later selected the stimulus opposite the singleton even though no saccade was produced. These patterns of activity are consistent with the hypotheses that covert shifts of attention can occur without saccade production and that FEF contributes to covert as well as overt orienting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The frontal eye field contains neurons with shifting receptive fields.
“One brain area that contains neurons with this property is the frontal eye field (FEF), a cortical structure that is involved in vision and eye-movement control42.”
From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [42]
At least some of the CD for shifting receptive fields arises from a pathway that ascends from the midbrain to the frontal eye field.
“At least some of this CD arises from a pathway that ascends from the midbrain40,41 to the frontal eye field, a cortical structure that is involved in visual processing and eye-movement control42.”
From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 287
- Authors
- Schall, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schall, Jeffrey D.
- ORCID
- Schall, Jeffrey D.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1453-1467
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136639539
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Vision Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (R01 EY08890, P30-EY08126, R01EY008890, P30EY008126)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD015052)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- frontal eye field, saccades, covert attention, attentional shift, prosaccades, antisaccades, gaze direction, singletons, neuronal activity, macaque
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Color Perception, Cues, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Eye, Macaca radiata, Neurons, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Saccades, Visual Fields
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review