Cited by 59Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Simulating prosthetic vision: II. Measuring functional capacity

Open access
Chen, Spencer C., Suaning, Gregg J., Morley, John W., Lovell, Nigel H.·2009·Vision Research

Abstract

Investigators of microelectronic visual prosthesis devices have found that some aspects of vision can be restored in the form of spots of light in the visual field, so-called "phosphenes", from which more rich and complex scenes may be composed. However, questions still surround the capabilities of how such a form of vision can allow its recipients to "see" and to carry out everyday activities. Through simulations of prosthetic vision, researchers can experience first-hand many performance and behavioral aspects of prosthetic vision, and studies conducted on a larger population can inform the performance and behavioral preferences in general and in individual cases. This review examines the findings from the various investigations of the functional capacity of prosthetic vision conducted through simulations, especially on the topics of letter acuity, reading, navigation, learning and visual scanning adaptation. Central to the review, letter acuity is posited as a reference measurement so that results and performance trends across the various simulation models and functional assessment tasks can be more readily compared and generalized. Future directions for simulation based research are discussed with respect to designing a functional visual prosthesis, improving functional vision in near-term low-phosphene-count devices, and pursuing image processing strategies to impart the most comprehensible prosthetic vision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.visres.2009.07.003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This number might underestimate the real needs of implanted patients due to the perceptual and behavioural learning required to adapt to artificial vision.

    “However, this number might underestimate the real needs of implanted patients due to the perceptual and behavioural learning required to adapt to artificial vision [121,122].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 104 · Cited by 59

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Brindley, G. S., & Rushton, D. N. (1974). Implanted stimulators of the visual cortex as visual prosthetic devices. Transactions of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, 78, OP741-OP745.
  2. Button, J., & Putnam, T. (1962). Visual responses to cortical stimulation in the blind. Journal of the Iowa Medical Society, 52, 17-21.
  3. Dowling, J., Boles, W. & Maeder, A. (2005). Mobility assessment using simulated artificial human vision. In 2005 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (Vol. 3, pp. 32-32).
  4. Hallum, L. E., Taubman, D., Suaning, G. J., Morley, J. & Lovell, N. H. (2003). A filtering approach to artificial vision: a phosphene visual tracking task. In IFMBE proceedings, World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering, August 24-29, Sydney.

Authors
Chen, S. C., Suaning, G. J., Morley, J. W., & Lovell, N. H.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Chen, Spencer C.
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
49
Issue
19
Pages
2329-2343
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966794568
Cited by
59
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
visual prosthesis, phosphenes, letter acuity, reading, navigation, functional vision assessment, vision restoration
MeSH terms
Blindness, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Phosphenes, Psychophysics, Reading, Visual Acuity, Treatment Outcome, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review