Simulating prosthetic vision: II. Measuring functional capacity
Open accessAbstract
Investigators of microelectronic visual prosthesis devices have found that some aspects of vision can be restored in the form of spots of light in the visual field, so-called "phosphenes", from which more rich and complex scenes may be composed. However, questions still surround the capabilities of how such a form of vision can allow its recipients to "see" and to carry out everyday activities. Through simulations of prosthetic vision, researchers can experience first-hand many performance and behavioral aspects of prosthetic vision, and studies conducted on a larger population can inform the performance and behavioral preferences in general and in individual cases. This review examines the findings from the various investigations of the functional capacity of prosthetic vision conducted through simulations, especially on the topics of letter acuity, reading, navigation, learning and visual scanning adaptation. Central to the review, letter acuity is posited as a reference measurement so that results and performance trends across the various simulation models and functional assessment tasks can be more readily compared and generalized. Future directions for simulation based research are discussed with respect to designing a functional visual prosthesis, improving functional vision in near-term low-phosphene-count devices, and pursuing image processing strategies to impart the most comprehensible prosthetic vision.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This number might underestimate the real needs of implanted patients due to the perceptual and behavioural learning required to adapt to artificial vision.
“However, this number might underestimate the real needs of implanted patients due to the perceptual and behavioural learning required to adapt to artificial vision [121,122].”
From Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [122]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 104 · Cited by 59
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Brindley, G. S., & Rushton, D. N. (1974). Implanted stimulators of the visual cortex as visual prosthetic devices. Transactions of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, 78, OP741-OP745.
- Button, J., & Putnam, T. (1962). Visual responses to cortical stimulation in the blind. Journal of the Iowa Medical Society, 52, 17-21.
- Dowling, J., Boles, W. & Maeder, A. (2005). Mobility assessment using simulated artificial human vision. In 2005 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (Vol. 3, pp. 32-32).
- Hallum, L. E., Taubman, D., Suaning, G. J., Morley, J. & Lovell, N. H. (2003). A filtering approach to artificial vision: a phosphene visual tracking task. In IFMBE proceedings, World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering, August 24-29, Sydney.
- Authors
- Chen, S. C., Suaning, G. J., Morley, J. W., & Lovell, N. H.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Spencer C.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 2329-2343
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966794568
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Vision Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- visual prosthesis, phosphenes, letter acuity, reading, navigation, functional vision assessment, vision restoration
- MeSH terms
- Blindness, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Phosphenes, Psychophysics, Reading, Visual Acuity, Treatment Outcome, Prostheses and Implants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review