Cited by 27Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationNeuroscience and Music Perception

Parahippocampal cortex is involved in material processing via echoes in blind echolocation experts

Open access
Milne, Jennifer L., Arnott, Stephen R., Kish, Daniel, Goodale, Melvyn A., Thaler, Lore·2015·Vision Research

Abstract

Some blind humans use sound to navigate by emitting mouth-clicks and listening to the echoes that reflect from silent objects and surfaces in their surroundings. These echoes contain information about the size, shape, location, and material properties of objects. Here we present results from an fMRI experiment that investigated the neural activity underlying the processing of materials through echolocation. Three blind echolocation experts (as well as three blind and three sighted non-echolocating control participants) took part in the experiment. First, we made binaural sound recordings in the ears of each echolocator while he produced clicks in the presence of one of three different materials (fleece, synthetic foliage, or whiteboard), or while he made clicks in an empty room. During fMRI scanning these recordings were played back to participants. Remarkably, all participants were able to identify each of the three materials reliably, as well as the empty room. Furthermore, a whole brain analysis, in which we isolated the processing of just the reflected echoes, revealed a material-related increase in BOLD activation in a region of left parahippocampal cortex in the echolocating participants, but not in the blind or sighted control participants. Our results, in combination with previous findings about brain areas involved in material processing, are consistent with the idea that material processing by means of echolocation relies on a multi-modal material processing area in parahippocampal cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.visres.2014.07.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 27

Authors
Milne, J. L., Arnott, S. R., Kish, D., Goodale, M. A., & Thaler, L.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Rotman Research Institute (CA)
  • Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Goodale, Melvyn A.
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
109
Pages
139-148
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970385985
Cited by
27
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (#6313)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
echolocation, parahippocampal cortex, materials processing, echo processing, auditory navigation, multisensory integration, BOLD activation
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Perception, Blindness, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychoacoustics, Sound Localization, Case-Control Studies, Physical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review