Cited by 43Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Oculomotor behavior of blind patients seeing with a subretinal visual implant

Open access
Hafed, Ziad M., Stingl, Katarina, Bartz-Schmidt, Karl-Ulrich, Gekeler, Florian, Zrenner, Eberhart·2016·Vision Research

Abstract

Electronic implants are able to restore some visual function in blind patients with hereditary retinal degenerations. Subretinal visual implants, such as the CE-approved Retina Implant Alpha IMS (Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany), sense light through the eye's optics and subsequently stimulate retinal bipolar cells via ∼1500 independent pixels to project visual signals to the brain. Because these devices are directly implanted beneath the fovea, they potentially harness the full benefit of eye movements to scan scenes and fixate objects. However, so far, the oculomotor behavior of patients using subretinal implants has not been characterized. Here, we tracked eye movements in two blind patients seeing with a subretinal implant, and we compared them to those of three healthy controls. We presented bright geometric shapes on a dark background, and we asked the patients to report seeing them or not. We found that once the patients visually localized the shapes, they fixated well and exhibited classic oculomotor fixational patterns, including the generation of microsaccades and ocular drifts. Further, we found that a reduced frequency of saccades and microsaccades was correlated with loss of visibility. Last, but not least, gaze location corresponded to the location of the stimulus, and shape and size aspects of the viewed stimulus were reflected by the direction and size of saccades. Our results pave the way for future use of eye tracking in subretinal implant patients, not only to understand their oculomotor behavior, but also to design oculomotor training strategies that can help improve their quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ideal case of avoiding fading is rarely reached and has only been reported for the PRIMA device and some patients with Alpha IMS, most likely with preserved eye movements.

    “However, this ideal case is rarely reached and has only been reported for the PRIMA device [48] and some patients with Alpha IMS, most likely with preserved eye movements [154].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 43

Authors
Hafed, Z. M., Stingl, K., Bartz-Schmidt, K.-U., Gekeler, F., & Zrenner, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Katharinenhospital (DE)
Corresponding author
Hafed, Ziad M.
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
118
Pages
119-131
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082035420
Cited by
43
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience
  • Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany
  • German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01GQ1002)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
oculomotor behavior, eye movements, microsaccades, saccades, ocular drift, fixation, retinal degeneration, eye tracking, oculomotor training, stimulus localization
MeSH terms
Adult, Blindness, Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Eye Movements, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Saccades, Vision, Ocular, Visual Acuity, Visual Perception, Visual Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review