Oculomotor behavior of blind patients seeing with a subretinal visual implant
Open accessAbstract
Electronic implants are able to restore some visual function in blind patients with hereditary retinal degenerations. Subretinal visual implants, such as the CE-approved Retina Implant Alpha IMS (Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany), sense light through the eye's optics and subsequently stimulate retinal bipolar cells via ∼1500 independent pixels to project visual signals to the brain. Because these devices are directly implanted beneath the fovea, they potentially harness the full benefit of eye movements to scan scenes and fixate objects. However, so far, the oculomotor behavior of patients using subretinal implants has not been characterized. Here, we tracked eye movements in two blind patients seeing with a subretinal implant, and we compared them to those of three healthy controls. We presented bright geometric shapes on a dark background, and we asked the patients to report seeing them or not. We found that once the patients visually localized the shapes, they fixated well and exhibited classic oculomotor fixational patterns, including the generation of microsaccades and ocular drifts. Further, we found that a reduced frequency of saccades and microsaccades was correlated with loss of visibility. Last, but not least, gaze location corresponded to the location of the stimulus, and shape and size aspects of the viewed stimulus were reflected by the direction and size of saccades. Our results pave the way for future use of eye tracking in subretinal implant patients, not only to understand their oculomotor behavior, but also to design oculomotor training strategies that can help improve their quality of life.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ideal case of avoiding fading is rarely reached and has only been reported for the PRIMA device and some patients with Alpha IMS, most likely with preserved eye movements.
“However, this ideal case is rarely reached and has only been reported for the PRIMA device [48] and some patients with Alpha IMS, most likely with preserved eye movements [154].”
From Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [154]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Hafed, Z. M., Stingl, K., Bartz-Schmidt, K.-U., Gekeler, F., & Zrenner, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- Katharinenhospital (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Hafed, Ziad M.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 118
- Pages
- 119-131
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082035420
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Vision Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience
- Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01GQ1002)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- oculomotor behavior, eye movements, microsaccades, saccades, ocular drift, fixation, retinal degeneration, eye tracking, oculomotor training, stimulus localization
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blindness, Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Eye Movements, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Saccades, Vision, Ocular, Visual Acuity, Visual Perception, Visual Prosthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review