Parallel processing in human visual cortex revealed through the influence of their neural responses on the visual evoked potential
Open accessAbstract
The neural response in the human visual system is composed of magno-, parvo- and koniocellular input from the retina. Signal differences from functional imaging between health and individuals with a cognitive weakness are attributed to a dysfunction of a specific retinal input. Yet, anatomical interconnections within the human visual system obscure individual contribution to the neural response in V1. Deflections in the visual evoked potential (VEP) arise from an interaction between electric dipoles, their strength determined by the size of the neural population active during temporal - and spatial luminance contrast processing. To investigate interaction between these neural responses, we recorded the VEP over visual cortex of 14 healthy adults viewing four series of windmill patterns. Within a series, the relative area white in a pattern varied systematically. Between series, the number of sectors across which this area was distributed doubled. These patterns were viewed as pattern alternating and on-/off stimuli. P100/P1 amplitude increased linearly with the relative area white in the pattern, while N135/N1 and P240/P2 amplitude increased with the number of sectors of which the area white was distributed. The decreases P100 amplitude with increasing number of sectors is attributed to an interaction between electric dipoles located in granular and supragranular layers of V1. Differences between the VEP components obtained during a pattern reversing display and following pattern onset are accounted for by the transient and sustained nature of neural responses processing temporal - and spatial luminance contrast and ability of these responses to manifest in the VEP.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The brain relies mainly on deeper processing within the primary visual cortex to extract large-scale information from degraded visual signals.
“This pattern suggests that the brain relies mainly on deeper processing within the primary visual cortex to extract large-scale information from degraded visual signals.[22]”
From Brain Rewires to Stabilize Walking During Visual Impairment · cites this paper as [22]
The Abstract and section 4.4 describe V1 responses to patterned stimuli and interactions between cortical layers. Neither addresses degraded visual signals or says the brain relies mainly on deeper V1 processing to extract large-scale information; searches for those concepts found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 85 · Cited by 2
- Authors
- Marcar, V. L., Battegay, E., Schmidt, D., & Cheetham, M.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Zurich (CH)
- University of Basel (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Marcar, V.L.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 193
- Pages
- 107994
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4206065225
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Vision Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- visual evoked potentials, primary visual cortex, parallel computing, electric dipole, P100
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Eye Diseases, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Retina, Visual Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review