Cited by 222Climate variability and modelsClimate Change and Environmental ImpactMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection and attribution of climate extremes in the observed record

Open access

Abstract

We present an overview of practices and challenges related to the detection and attribution of observed changes in climate extremes. Detection is the identification of a statistically significant change in the extreme values of a climate variable over some period of time. Issues in detection discussed include data quality, coverage, and completeness. Attribution takes that detection of a change and uses climate model simulations to evaluate whether a cause can be assigned to that change. Additionally, we discuss a newer field of attribution, event attribution, where individual extreme events are analyzed for the express purpose of assigning some measure of whether that event was directly influenced by anthropogenic forcing of the climate system.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wace.2016.01.001

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 87 references

5 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Folland, 2014, The International CLIVAR Climate of the 20th Century Plus (C20C+) Project: Report of the Sixth Workshop, CLIVAR Exch., 19, 57
  2. van Oldenborgh, 2012, The absence of a role of climate change in the 2011 Thailand floods, Bull. Am. Met. Soc, 93, 1047

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 222

Metadata

Authors
Easterling, D. R., Kunkel, K. E., Wehner, M. F., & Sun, L.
Affiliations
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Easterling, David R.
Venue
Weather and Climate Extremes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
11
Pages
17-27
ISSN
2212-0947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2278233808
Cited by
218
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 3
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Weather and Climate Extremes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
World Meteorological Organization’s
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
climate extremes, detection and attribution, event attribution, anthropogenic forcing, climate model simulation, extreme value statistics, data quality, data coverage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review