The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review on automated sorting of source-separated municipal solid waste for recycling
Gundupalli, S. P., Hait, S., & Thakur, A. (2017) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.015 · Cited by 583
Erses Yay, A. S. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.089 · Cited by 300
Huang, T., Shi, F., Tanikawa, H., Fei, J., & Han, J. (2013) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.12.013 · Cited by 269
A system dynamics approach for enhancing social behaviours regarding the reuse of packaging
Babader, A., Ren, J., Jones, K. O., & Wang, J. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.025 · Cited by 52
Chen, P., Sauerwein, M., & Steuer, B. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118072 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Banar, M., Cokaygil, Z., & Ozkan, A.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-62
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097087240
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006
- The paper
- Banar, M., Cokaygil, Z., & Ozkan, A. (2009). Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
