Cited by 125Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionWastewater Treatment and ReuseHeavy metals in environment

Chemical and microbiological hazards associated with recycling of anaerobic digested residue intended for agricultural use

Govasmark, Espen, Stäb, Jessica, Holen, Børge, Hoornstra, Douwe, Nesbakk, Tommy, Salkinoja-Salonen, Mirja·2011·Waste Management

Abstract

In the present study, three full-scale biogas plants (BGP) were investigated for the concentration of heavy metals, organic pollutants, pesticides and the pathogenic bacteria Bacillus cereus and Escherichia coli in the anaerobically digested residues (ADR). The BGPs mainly utilize source-separated organic wastes and industrial food waste as energy sources and separate the ADR into an ADR-liquid and an ADR-solid fraction by centrifugation at the BGP. According to the Norwegian standard for organic fertilizers, the ADR were classified as quality 1 mainly because of high zinc (132-422 mg kg(-1) DM) and copper (23-93 mg kg(-1) DM) concentrations, but also because of high cadmium (0.21-0.60 mg kg(-1) DM) concentrations in the liquid-ADR. In the screening of organic pollutants, only DEHP (9.7-62.1 mg kg(-1)) and ∑ PAH 16 (0.2-1.98 mg kg(-1) DM) were detected in high concentrations according to international regulations. Of the 250 pesticides analyzed, 11 were detected, but only imazalil (<0.30-5.77 mg kg(-1) DM) and thiabendazol (<0.14-0.73 mg kg(-1) DM) were frequently detected in the ADR-fiber. Concentrations of imazalil and thiabendazol were highest during the winter months, due to a high consumption of citrus fruits in Norway in this period. Ten percent of the ADR-liquid samples contained cereulide-producing B. cereus, whereas no verotoxigenic E. coli was detected. The authors conclude that the risk of chemical and bacterial contamination of the food chain or the environment from agricultural use of ADR seems low.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 125

Authors
Govasmark, E., Stäb, J., Holen, B., Hoornstra, D., Nesbakk, T., & Salkinoja-Salonen, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Stuttgart (DE)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
2577-2583
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077768661
Cited by
125
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
Keywords
anaerobic digestion residues, biogas plants, heavy metals, cadmium, zinc, copper, organic pollutants, DEHP, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pesticides, imazalil, Bacillus cereus, cereulide, Escherichia coli, food safety
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Hazardous Waste, Norway, Pesticides, Seasons, Metals, Heavy, Biofuels, Recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review