Chemical and microbiological hazards associated with recycling of anaerobic digested residue intended for agricultural use
Abstract
In the present study, three full-scale biogas plants (BGP) were investigated for the concentration of heavy metals, organic pollutants, pesticides and the pathogenic bacteria Bacillus cereus and Escherichia coli in the anaerobically digested residues (ADR). The BGPs mainly utilize source-separated organic wastes and industrial food waste as energy sources and separate the ADR into an ADR-liquid and an ADR-solid fraction by centrifugation at the BGP. According to the Norwegian standard for organic fertilizers, the ADR were classified as quality 1 mainly because of high zinc (132-422 mg kg(-1) DM) and copper (23-93 mg kg(-1) DM) concentrations, but also because of high cadmium (0.21-0.60 mg kg(-1) DM) concentrations in the liquid-ADR. In the screening of organic pollutants, only DEHP (9.7-62.1 mg kg(-1)) and ∑ PAH 16 (0.2-1.98 mg kg(-1) DM) were detected in high concentrations according to international regulations. Of the 250 pesticides analyzed, 11 were detected, but only imazalil (<0.30-5.77 mg kg(-1) DM) and thiabendazol (<0.14-0.73 mg kg(-1) DM) were frequently detected in the ADR-fiber. Concentrations of imazalil and thiabendazol were highest during the winter months, due to a high consumption of citrus fruits in Norway in this period. Ten percent of the ADR-liquid samples contained cereulide-producing B. cereus, whereas no verotoxigenic E. coli was detected. The authors conclude that the risk of chemical and bacterial contamination of the food chain or the environment from agricultural use of ADR seems low.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other studies found smaller amounts of metal(loid)s in digestate from poultry manure than in digestate from energy crops or food and garden waste.
“However, other studies found smaller amounts of metal(loid)s in digestate from poultry manure than in digestate from energy crops (Lehtomäki and Björnsson, 2006) or food and garden waste (Govasmark et al., 2011).”
From Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—A vision how to mobilize marginal lands (2018) · cites this paper as Govasmark et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 125
- Authors
- Govasmark, E., Stäb, J., Holen, B., Hoornstra, D., Nesbakk, T., & Salkinoja-Salonen, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Stuttgart (DE)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2577-2583
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077768661
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 9.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Waste Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Keywords
- anaerobic digestion residues, biogas plants, heavy metals, cadmium, zinc, copper, organic pollutants, DEHP, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pesticides, imazalil, Bacillus cereus, cereulide, Escherichia coli, food safety
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Hazardous Waste, Norway, Pesticides, Seasons, Metals, Heavy, Biofuels, Recycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review