Costs of food waste along the value chain: Evidence from South Africa
Abstract
In a previous paper (Nahman et al., 2012), the authors estimated the costs of household food waste in South Africa, based on the market value of the wasted food (edible portion only), as well as the costs of disposal to landfill. In this paper, we extend the analysis by assessing the costs of edible food waste throughout the entire food value chain, from agricultural production through to consumption at the household level. First, food waste at each stage of the value chain was quantified in physical units (tonnes) for various food commodity groups. Then, weighted average representative prices (per tonne) were estimated for each commodity group at each stage of the value chain. Finally, prices were multiplied by quantities, and the resulting values were aggregated across the value chain for all commodity groups. In this way, the total cost of food waste across the food value chain in South Africa was estimated at R61.5 billion per annum (approximately US$7.7 billion); equivalent to 2.1% of South Africa's annual gross domestic product. The bulk of this cost arises from the processing and distribution stages of the fruit and vegetable value chain, as well as the agricultural production and distribution stages of the meat value chain. These results therefore provide an indication of where interventions aimed at reducing food waste should be targeted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 119
- Authors
- Nahman, A., & de Lange, W.
- Affiliations
- Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Nahman, Anton
- ORCID
- Nahman, Anton
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2493-2500
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078455854
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Waste Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Keywords
- food waste, food value chains, South Africa, meat value chain, food processing and distribution, agricultural production, household food waste, food waste reduction interventions, food prices
- MeSH terms
- Food, Garbage, South Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review