CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 61

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Economic aspects of thermal treatment of solid waste in a sustainable WM system

Massarutto, Antonio·2015·Waste Management
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.08.024
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.08.024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. Abbott, 2013, Recycling: social norms and warm-glow revisited, Ecol. Econ., 90, 10, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.015 · DOI
  2. Abd Kadir, 2013, Incineration of municipal solid waste in Malaysia: salient issues, policies and waste-to-energy initiatives, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 24, 181, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.041 · DOI
  3. Achillas, 2011, Social acceptance for the development of a waste-to-energy plant in an urban area, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 55, 857, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.04.012 · DOI
  4. Aldy, 2014, Environmental risk and uncertainty, vol. 1, 601
  5. Arena, 2013, Element partitioning in combustion- and gasification-based waste-to-energy units, Waste Manage., 33, 1142, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.035 · DOI
  6. Baciocchi, 2010, Accelerated carbonation of different size fractions of bottom ash from RDF incineration, Waste Manage., 30, 1310, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.027 · DOI
  7. Barrett, 1997, Questioning the waste hierarchy: the case of a region with low population density, J. Environ. Plann. Manage., 40, 19, 10.1080/09640569712263 · DOI
  8. Bel, 2010, Empirical analysis of solid waste management costs: some evidence from Galicia, Spain, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 54, 187, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.015 · DOI
  9. Birnstegel, B., 2011. Treatment capacity and cross-boundary waste flows in Europe, ISWA Beacon Conference on WtE, Malmoe, <http://www.beacon-wte.net/fileadmin/avfallsverige/Documentation_2011/1-3_Prognos_Tolvik.pdf>.
  10. Bontempi, E., 2013. Stabilizzazione con silice amorfa di polveri residue da termovalorizzazione: i progetti COSMOS e COSMOS-Rice, MATER Conference on “Technologies and trends for thermal treatment of waste”, Piacenza, 12–13 May.
  11. Brunner, 2014, Waste to energy – key element for sustainable waste management, Waste Manage., 37, 3, 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.003 · DOI
  12. Buonanno, G., Morawska, L., 2014., Ultrafine particle emission of waste incinerators and comparison to the exposure of urban citizens, Waste Manage. 37, 75–81. · DOI
  13. Cavazza, N., Rubichi, S., 2013. Ways of thinking about the incinerator: a typology of citizens’ mindsets. Social Sci. J., in press, <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2013.10.008>. · DOI
  14. Cernuschi, S., 2013. Emissioni di polveri ultrafini e nanoparticolato da impianti di termodistruzione dei rifiuti, MATER Conference on “Technologies and trends for thermal treatment of waste”, Piacenza, 12–13 May.
  15. Chang, 2007, Minimax regret minimization analysis for a regional solid waste management system, Waste Manage., 27, 820, 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.05.002 · DOI
  16. Chen, 2014, Incentive regulation and performance measurement of Taiwan’s incineration plants: an application of the four-stage DEA method, J. Prod. Anal., 41, 277, 10.1007/s11123-013-0341-3 · DOI
  17. Clavreul, 2012, Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modeling of waste management systems, Waste Manage., 32, 2482, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.008 · DOI
  18. Cleary, 2009, Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature, Environ. Manage. Res., 14, 515
  19. Consonni, 2011, Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems. Project overview and main results, Waste Manage., 31, 2057, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.04.016 · DOI
  20. Copeland, 1991, International trade in waste products in the presence of illegal disposal, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 20, 143, 10.1016/0095-0696(91)90047-M · DOI
  21. Cordioli, 2013, A review of exposure assessment methods in epidemiological studies on incinerators, J. Environ. Public Health, 10.1155/2013/129470 · DOI
  22. Corvellec, 2013, Infrastructures, lock-in, and sustainable urban development: the case of waste incineration in the Göteborg Metropolitan Area, J. Cleaner Prod., 50, 22, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.009 · DOI
  23. Cossu, 2011, Waste management, energy production, healthcare: amazing similarities, Waste Manage., 31, 1671, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.05.001 · DOI
  24. Cossu, 2013, Re-thinking incentives and penalties; economic aspects of waste management in Italy, Waste Manage., 33, 2541, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.04.011 · DOI
  25. Cucchiella, 2014, Sustainable management of waste-to-energy facilities, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 33, 719, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.015 · DOI
  26. De Boom, 2011, MSWI boiler fly ashes: magnetic separation for material recovery, Waste Manage., 31, 1505, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.002 · DOI
  27. Dijkgraaf, 2004, Burn or bury? A social comparison of waste treatment methods, Ecol. Econ., 50, 233, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.029 · DOI
  28. Dijkgraaf, 2005, Literature review of social costs and benefits of waste disposal and recycling
  29. Dubois, 2013, Disparities in European taxation of combustible waste, Waste Manage., 33, 1575, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.001 · DOI
  30. Economopoulos, 2010, Technoeconomic aspects of alternative municipal solid wastes treatment methods, Waste Manage., 30, 707, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.004 · DOI
  31. Ekvall, 2007, What LCA does and does not in assessments of waste management, Waste Manage., 27, 989, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.015 · DOI
  32. Eshet, 2006, Valuation of externalities of selected waste management alternatives: a compared review and analysis, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 46, 335, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.08.004 · DOI
  33. Federico, 2010, Cancer incidence in people with residential exposure to a municipal waste incinerator: An ecological study in Modena (Italy), 1991–2005, Waste Manage., 30, 1362, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.032 · DOI
  34. Ferreira, 2010, Protest responses and community attitudes toward accepting compensation to host waste disposal infrastructure, Land Use Policy, 7, 638, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.020 · DOI
  35. Franchini, 2004, Health effects of exposure to waste incinerator emissions: a review of epidemiological studies, Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 40, 101
  36. Giusti, 2009, A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health, Waste Manage., 29, 2227, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.028 · DOI
  37. Gupta, 2011, Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: a review, Publ. Understanding Sci., 21, 782, 10.1177/0963662510392485 · DOI
  38. Hellweg, 2005, Assessing the eco-efficiency of end-of-pipe technologies with the environmental cost efficiency indicator: the case of MSW, J. Ind. Ecol., 9, 189, 10.1162/108819805775247864 · DOI
  39. Hu, 2001, Health effects of waste incineration: a review of epidemiologic studies, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 51, 1100, 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464324 · DOI
  40. Huhtala, 1999, How much do money, inconvenience and pollution matter? Analysing households demand for large-scale recycling and incineration, J. Environ. Manage., 55, 27, 10.1006/jema.1998.0245 · DOI
  41. Jamasb, 2013, Issues and options in waste management: a social cost–benefit analysis of waste-to-energy in the UK, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 54, 1341, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.05.004 · DOI
  42. Juul, 2013, Challenges when performing economic optimization of waste treatment: a review, Waste Manage., 33, 1918, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.04.015 · DOI
  43. Kellenberg, 2010, Consumer waste, backhauling and pollution havens, J. Appl. Econom.., 13, 283, 10.1016/S1514-0326(10)60013-X · DOI
  44. Kellenberg, 2012, Trading wastes, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 64, 68, 10.1016/j.jeem.2012.02.003 · DOI
  45. Kinnaman, 2009, The economics of waste management, Waste Manage., 29, 2615, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.031 · DOI
  46. Kinnaman, T., Fullerton, D., 1999. The economics of residential waste management, NBER Working Paper 7326, <http://www.nber.org/papers/w7326.pdf>. · DOI
  47. Ley, 2002, Spatially and intertemporally efficient waste management: the costs of interstate trade restrictions, J. Environ. Econom. Manage., 43, 188, 10.1006/jeem.2000.1179 · DOI
  48. Lima, 2004, On the influence of risk perception on mental health: living near an incinerator, J. Environ. Psychol., 24, 71, 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00026-4 · DOI
  49. Manders, I., 2009. The renewable energy contribution from waste across Europe, ISWA Dakofa Conference, December 3, <www.cewep.eu/information/publicationsandstudies/studies/climate-protection/m_592>.
  50. Marklund, 2003, Reuse or burn? Evaluating the producer responsibility for waste paper, J. Environ. Plann. Manage., 46, 381, 10.1080/0964056032000096893 · DOI
  51. Marques, 2008, Does the sunshine regulatory approach work? Governance and regulation model for waste services in Portugal, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 52, 1040, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.04.002 · DOI
  52. Massarutto, 2007, Waste management as a public utility: options for competition in an environmentally-regulated industry, Utilities Policy, 15, 9, 10.1016/j.jup.2006.09.003 · DOI
  53. Massarutto, 2012, The brown side of the green economy: urban garbage and the zero-waste utopia, Econom. Policy Energy Environ., 3, 81, 10.3280/EFE2012-003007 · DOI
  54. Massarutto, 2014, The long and winding road to resource efficiency: an interdisciplinary perspective on extended producer responsibility, Resour., Conservation Recycl., 85, 11, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.005 · DOI
  55. Massarutto, 2013, The municipal waste management sector in Europe: shifting boundaries between public service and the market, Ann. Publ. Cooperative Econom., 83, 505
  56. Massarutto, 2011, Materials and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems: a life-cycle costing approach, Waste Manage., 31, 2102, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.05.017 · DOI
  57. Murphy, 2004, Technical, economic and environmental analysis of energy production from municipal solid waste, Renewable Energy, 29, 1043, 10.1016/j.renene.2003.12.002 · DOI
  58. Reich, 2005, Economic assessment of municipal waste management systems – case studies using a combination of life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC), J. Cleaner Prod., 13, 253, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.015 · DOI
  59. Rocca, 2012, Characterisation of major component leaching and buffering capacity of RDF incineration and gasification bottom ash in relation to reuse or disposal scenarios, Waste Manage., 32, 759, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.11.018 · DOI
  60. Simoes, 2011, How does the operational environment affect utility performance? A parametric study on the waste sector, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 55, 695, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.02.001 · DOI
  61. Simoes, 2012, On the economic performance of the waste sector. A literature review, J. Environ. Manage., 106, 40, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.005 · DOI
  62. Thorneloe, 2007, Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management, Waste Manage., 27, 1006, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.024 · DOI
  63. Trulli, 2013, Incineration of pre-treated municipal solid waste (MSW) for energy co-generation in a non-densely populated area, Sustainability, 5, 5333, 10.3390/su5125333 · DOI
  64. WHO (World Health Organization), 2007. Population health and waste management: scientific data and policy options, Report of the WHO Workshop in Rome, 29–30 March, <http://www.euro.who.int>.
  65. Wunsch, C., 2011. Comparison of MBT and WtE from a climate and cost point of view, ISWA Beacon Conference on WtE, Malmoe, <http://www.beacon-wte.net/fileadmin/avfallsverige/Documentation_2011/2-3._Wuensch.pdf>.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Massarutto, A.
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
37
Pages
45-57
ISSN
0956-053X
DOI
10.1016/j.wasman.2014.08.024
Cited by
61
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review