Optimization of greenhouse gas emissions in second-hand consumer product recovery through reuse platforms
Abstract
Product reuse in the solid waste management sector is promoted as one of the key strategies for waste prevention. This practice is considered to have favorable impact on the environment, but its benefits have yet to be established. Existing research describes the perspective of "avoided production" only, but has failed to examine the interdependent nature of reuse practices within an entire solid waste management system. This study proposes a new framework that uses optimization to minimize the greenhouse gas emissions of an integrated solid waste management system that includes reuse strategies and practices such as reuse enterprises, online platforms, and materials exchanges along with traditional solid waste management practices such as recycling, landfilling, and incineration. The proposed framework uses material flow analysis in combination with an optimization model to provide the best outcome in terms of GHG emissions by redistributing product flows in the integrated solid waste management system to the least impacting routes and processes. The optimization results provide a basis for understanding the contributions of reuse to the environmental benefits of the integrated solid waste management system and the exploration of the effects of reuse activities on waste prevention. A case study involving second-hand clothing is presented to illustrate the implementation of the proposed framework as applied to the material flow. Results of the case study showed the considerab…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When reuse and recycling are both considered, reuse is found to be more beneficial than recycling, except under certain circumstances with regard to transportation distances.
“When reuse and recycling are both considered, the former is found to be more beneficial than the latter (Dahlbo et al., 2017;Schmidt et al., 2016;Zamani et al., 2015;Beton et al., 2014;Corsten et al., 2013;Palm et al., 2013;Farrant et al., 2010;McGill, 2009;Bartl, 2009), except for under certain circumstances with regard to transportation distances (Fortuna and Diyamandoglu, 2017).”
From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Fortuna and Diyamandoglu, 2017
Data from Zamani et al. (2015) has subsequently been used as input to Dahlbo et al. (2017) and Fortuna and Diyamandoglu (2017), thus reproducing the uncertainties.
“Data from the latter has subsequently been used as input to the studies of Dahlbo et al. (2017) and Fortuna and Diyamandoglu (2017), thus reproducing the uncertainties.”
From Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review (2018) · cites this paper as Fortuna and Diyamandoglu (2017)
Cites
The Environmental Impacts of Reuse: A Review
Cooper, D. R., & Gutowski, T. G. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12388 · Cited by 337 · cited 7× · see citing works
“…with observations from other studies on reuse (Farrant et al., 2010; Thomas, 2011; Vergara et al., 2015) where the negative impact from transportation of reused products was minor in comparison to the savings achieved from reducing the production of new products (Cooper and Gutowski, 2015).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFrom Waste to Resource: The Trade in Wastes and Global Recycling Economies
Gregson, N., & Crang, M. (2015) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021105 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Deconstruction of wood-framed houses: Material recovery and environmental impact
Diyamandoglu, V., & Fortuna, L. M. (2015) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.04.006 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationLevi, M., Cortesi, S., Vezzoli, C., & Salvia, G. (2011) · Packaging Technology and Science · doi:10.1002/pts.946 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review
Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266 · Cited by 1,087 · see citing works
“In contrast, Fortuna and Diyamandoglu (2017) found that low replacement rates can, under certain conditions, make textile reuse an environmentally inferior alternative compared to both incineration and recycling.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Fortuna, L. M., & Diyamandoglu, V.
- Affiliations
- City College of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fortuna, Lorena M.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 66
- Pages
- 178-189
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2609718562
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Waste Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
- Keywords
- product reuse, greenhouse gas emissions, integrated solid waste management, second-hand clothing, material flow analysis, waste prevention, recycling, landfilling, incineration
- MeSH terms
- Refuse Disposal, Incineration, Greenhouse Effect, Waste Management, Solid Waste
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review