The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sorting out a problem: A co-production approach to household waste management in Shanghai, China
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is where much of the literature highlights the positive role of community co-governance, advocacy by social organisations (Arantes et al., 2020; Lu and Sidortsov, 2019).”
From Untangling the critical success factors of the latest compulsory waste sorting initiative in Shanghai: The role of accountability governance (2024) · cites this paper as Lu and Sidortsov, 2019
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Ahmed, 2006, People as partners: facilitating people's participation in public–private partnerships for solid waste management, Habitat Int., 30, 781, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.09.004 · DOI
- Alford, 1998, A public management road less travelled: clients as co-producers of public services, Aust. J. Public Admin., 57, 128, 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01568.x · DOI
- Chen, 2014, Shanghai Formulates the policy to facilitate household waste sorting and reduction, Policy Outlook, 7, 55
- Guerrero, 2013, Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries, Waste Manage., 33, 220, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Gutberlet, 2015, More inclusive and cleaner cities with waste management co-production: Insights from participatory epistemologies and methods, Habitat Int., 46, 234, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.004 · DOI
- Hearn, 2005, The use of electrostatic techniques for the identification and sorting of waste packaging materials, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 44, 91, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.08.001 · DOI
- Howlett, 2017, Understanding co-production as a policy tool: integrating new public governance and comparative policy theory, J. Compar. Policy Anal.: Res. Pract., 1
- Hustinx, 2010, Social and cultural origins of motivations to volunteer: a comparison of university students in six countries, Int. Sociol., 25, 349, 10.1177/0268580909360297 · DOI
- Klijn, 2010, Trust in governance networks: Its impacts on outcomes, Admin. Soc., 42, 193, 10.1177/0095399710362716 · DOI
- Mizrahi, 2012, Self-provision of public services: its evolution and impact, Public Admin. Rev., 72, 285, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02505.x · DOI
- Onishi, 2005, How do the Japanese dump trash? let us count the myriad ways, New York Times, 12, 2
- Pestoff, 2010, Public governance and the third sector: opportunities for coproduction and innovation, New Public Gover., 223
- Peters, 2010, Meta-governance and public management, New Public Gover., 36
- Shanghai Statistics Bureau. (1978-2017). Shanghai Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
- Sørensen, 2012, Governance and innovation in the public sector, Oxford Handbook Gover., 215
- Tai, 2011, Municipal solid waste source-separated collection in China: a comparative analysis, Waste Manage., 31, 1673, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.014 · DOI
- Trevaskes, 2010, The shifting sands of punishment in China in the era of “Harmonious Society”, Law Policy, 32, 332, 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00323.x · DOI
- Wang, 2014, How is your view on “Fine on the refusal of waste sorting”, Youth Literator, 11, 4
- White, 2013, The role of governments in renewable energy: the importance of policy consistency, Biomass Bioenergy, 57, 97, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.035 · DOI
- Wu, 2016, Effects and improvement suggestions of green account system for waste classification and reduction in Shanghai, J. Shanghai Univ. (Nat. Sci.), 22, 197
- Xu, 2016, Perceived key elements of a successful residential food waste sorting program in urban apartments: stakeholder views, J. Cleaner Prod., 134, 362, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.107 · DOI
- Zhu, 2014, Faceoff five times, yet the crux remains——the dilemma of Shanghai waste sorting, Chinese Construct., 7, 14
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xie, S., Gong, Y., Zhang, A., Liu, Y., & Li, C. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141268 · Cited by 21
Hao, X., Dong, L., Qian, X., Benjamin, S., Wang, H., Chen, P., Wang, X., Ma, W., Li, J., Tong, X., et al. (2024) · npj Urban Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s42949-024-00179-4 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, H., & Sidortsov, R.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 95
- Pages
- 271-277
- ISSN
- 0956-053X
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
