Activated biochar derived from peanut shells as the electrode materials with excellent performance in Zinc-air battery and supercapacitance
Abstract
The use of activated biochar-based electrode derived from waste biomass in energy technologies, such as metal-air batteries and supercapacitors, is an important strategy for realizing energy and environmental sustainability in the future. Herein, peanut shells (waste biomass) were employed to prepare activated biochar materials by pyrolysis in molten KCl and heat-treatment. The effective dispersion and corrosion effects of molten salt for the pyrolysis products during pyrolysis obviously increase defects and specific surface area of the activated biochar materials. The prepared activated biochar material (PS-800-1000) by pyrolysis in molten KCl at 800 °C and heat-treatment at 1000 °C exhibits excellent catalytic activity with half-wave potential of 0.84 V vs. RHE, comparable to commercial Pt/C for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in 0.1 M KOH and outstanding supercapacitance performance in 6 M KOH with high specific capacitance (355 F g-1 at 0.5 A g-1), which exceeds all reported biochar derived from peanut shells. The PS-800-1000-based zinc-air battery (ZAB) displays higher peak power density (141 mW cm-2), specific capacity (767 mAh g Zn-1) and cycling stability than Pt/C-based ZAB. The activated biochar prepared by pyrolysis in molten KCl and heat-treatment method from peanut shells can be a promising candidate for replacing precious metals in energy conversion/storage devices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A biochar-based zinc-air battery exhibited higher specific capacity (767 mAh/g Zn vs 684 mAh/g Zn) and peak power density (141 mW/cm2 vs 126 mW/cm2) compared with conventional Pt/C based zinc air battery.
“Compared with the conventional Pt/C based zinc air battery, biochar-based battery exhibited higher specific capacity (767 mAh/g Zn vs 684 mAh/g Zn) and peak power density (141 mW/cm 2 vs 126 mW/cm 2 ) (Qiao et al. 2021).”
From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Qiao et al. 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality
Wang, L., Deng, J., Yang, X., Hou, R., & Hou, D. (2023) · Carbon Research · doi:10.1007/s44246-023-00035-7 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
- Authors
- Qiao, Y., Zhang, C., Kong, F., Zhao, Q., Kong, A., & Shan, Y.
- Affiliations
- East China Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Qingbiao
- Kong, Aiguo
- Shan, Yongkui
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 125
- Pages
- 257-267
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3139073048
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Waste Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (21303058)
- Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (13ZR1412400)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- activated biochar, peanut shell, oxygen reduction reaction, zinc-air batteries, supercapacitance, biomass-derived electrode materials, oxygen evolution reaction, specific capacitance, biomass waste valorization, Pt/C alternative
- MeSH terms
- Charcoal, Electrodes, Arachis, Zinc
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review