Cited by 76Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Activated biochar derived from peanut shells as the electrode materials with excellent performance in Zinc-air battery and supercapacitance

Qiao, Yu, Zhang, Chaoqi, Kong, Fantao, Zhao, Qingbiao, Kong, Aiguo, Shan, Yongkui·2021·Waste Management

Abstract

The use of activated biochar-based electrode derived from waste biomass in energy technologies, such as metal-air batteries and supercapacitors, is an important strategy for realizing energy and environmental sustainability in the future. Herein, peanut shells (waste biomass) were employed to prepare activated biochar materials by pyrolysis in molten KCl and heat-treatment. The effective dispersion and corrosion effects of molten salt for the pyrolysis products during pyrolysis obviously increase defects and specific surface area of the activated biochar materials. The prepared activated biochar material (PS-800-1000) by pyrolysis in molten KCl at 800 °C and heat-treatment at 1000 °C exhibits excellent catalytic activity with half-wave potential of 0.84 V vs. RHE, comparable to commercial Pt/C for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in 0.1 M KOH and outstanding supercapacitance performance in 6 M KOH with high specific capacitance (355 F g-1 at 0.5 A g-1), which exceeds all reported biochar derived from peanut shells. The PS-800-1000-based zinc-air battery (ZAB) displays higher peak power density (141 mW cm-2), specific capacity (767 mAh g Zn-1) and cycling stability than Pt/C-based ZAB. The activated biochar prepared by pyrolysis in molten KCl and heat-treatment method from peanut shells can be a promising candidate for replacing precious metals in energy conversion/storage devices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.057

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A biochar-based zinc-air battery exhibited higher specific capacity (767 mAh/g Zn vs 684 mAh/g Zn) and peak power density (141 mW/cm2 vs 126 mW/cm2) compared with conventional Pt/C based zinc air battery.

    “Compared with the conventional Pt/C based zinc air battery, biochar-based battery exhibited higher specific capacity (767 mAh/g Zn vs 684 mAh/g Zn) and peak power density (141 mW/cm 2 vs 126 mW/cm 2 ) (Qiao et al. 2021).”

    From Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality (2023) · cites this paper as Qiao et al. 2021

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qiao, Y., Zhang, C., Kong, F., Zhao, Q., Kong, A., & Shan, Y.
Affiliations
East China Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhao, Qingbiao
  • Kong, Aiguo
  • Shan, Yongkui
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
125
Pages
257-267
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3139073048
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21303058)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (13ZR1412400)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
activated biochar, peanut shell, oxygen reduction reaction, zinc-air batteries, supercapacitance, biomass-derived electrode materials, oxygen evolution reaction, specific capacitance, biomass waste valorization, Pt/C alternative
MeSH terms
Charcoal, Electrodes, Arachis, Zinc

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review