CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimization of subcritical water pre-treatment for biogas enhancement on co-digestion of pineapple waste and cow dung using the response surface methodology

Aili Hamzah, A.F., Hamzah, M.H., Mazlan, N.I., Che Man, H., Jamali, N.S., Siajam, S.I., Show, P.L.·2022·Waste Management
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.06.042
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The optimal pre-treatment method and conditions depend on the types of lignocellulose present due to the complexity and the variability of biomass chemical structures. This study optimized subcritical water pre-treatment to ensure maximum methane production from pineapple waste prior to anaerobic co-digestion with cow dung using the response surface methodology. A central composite design was achieved with three different factors and one response. A total of 20 pre-treatment runs were performed at different temperatures, reaction times and water to solid ratios suggesting optimum values for subcritical water pre-treatment at 128.52℃ for 5 min with 5.67 to 1 water to solid ratio. Under these conditions, methane yield increased from 59.09 to 85.05 mL CH 4 /g VS with an increase of 23% biogas yield and 44% methane yield from the untreated. All pre-treatments above 200℃ showed reductions in biogas yield. Compositional analysis showed slight reduction of lignin and increase in α-cellulose content after the pre-treatment. Analysis using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis verified the presence of cellulosic material in pre-treated pineapple waste. Most of the hemicellulose was solubilized in the liquid samples after SCW pre-treatment. The crystallinity index of pineapple waste was reduced from 57.58% (untreated) to 54.29% (pre-treated). Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the structural modification of pre-treated pineapple waste for better mic…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.06.042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Abdeshahian, 2016, Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 60, 714, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.117 · DOI
  2. Ahmad, 2018, Hydrothermal processing of biomass for anaerobic digestion – a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 98, 108, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.008 · DOI
  3. Ahmad Zamri, 2020, Valorisation of organic fraction municipal solid waste via anaerobic co-digestion of Malaysia tropical fruit for biogas production, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 476, 012077, 10.1088/1755-1315/476/1/012077 · DOI
  4. Ahmed, 2019, Improvement of anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass by hydrothermal pretreatment, Appl. Sci., 9, 3853, 10.3390/app9183853 · DOI
  5. Aili Hamzah, 2020, Anaerobic co-digestion of pineapple wastes with cow dung: effect of different total solid content on bio-methane yield, Adv Agri Food Res J, 1
  6. Aili Hamzah, 2021, Recent updates on the conversion of pineapple waste (Ananas comosus) to value-added products, future perspectives and challenges, Agronomy, 11, 2221, 10.3390/agronomy11112221 · DOI
  7. Antwi, 2019, Anaerobic digestion and the effect of hydrothermal pretreatment on the biogas yield of cocoa pods residues, Waste Manag., 88, 131, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.034 · DOI
  8. APHA, 1998. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.118. · DOI
  9. Atelge, 2020, A critical review of pretreatment technologies to enhance anaerobic digestion and energy recovery, Fuel, 270, 117494, 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117494 · DOI
  10. Azelee, N.I.W., Adnan, S.A.M., Manas, N.H.A., Dailin, D.J., Ramli, A.N.M., Illias, R.M., 2019. Assessment of microwave-assisted pretreatments for enhancing pineapple waste delignification, in: AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics Inc., p. 020003. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5125507. · DOI
  11. Bala, 2020, Study of biological and thermo-chemical pretreatment of organic fraction of municipal solid waste for enhanced biogas yield, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 27, 27293, 10.1007/s11356-019-05695-w · DOI
  12. Barua, 2018, Anaerobic biodegradability test of water hyacinth after microbial pretreatment to optimise the ideal F/M ratio, Fuel, 217, 91, 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.074 · DOI
  13. Chandra, 2012, Improving biodegradability and biogas production of wheat straw substrates using sodium hydroxide and hydrothermal pretreatments, Energy, 43, 273, 10.1016/j.energy.2012.04.029 · DOI
  14. Chen, 2021, Integrating enzymatic hydrolysis into subcritical water pretreatment optimization for bioethanol production from wheat straw, Sci. Total Environ., 770, 145321, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145321 · DOI
  15. Chen, 2020, Effects of acid/alkali pretreatments on lignocellulosic biomass mono-digestion and its co-digestion with waste activated sludge, J. Clean. Prod., 277, 123998, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123998 · DOI
  16. Dahunsi, 2019, Liquefaction of pineapple peel: pretreatment and process optimization, Energy, 185, 1017, 10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.123 · DOI
  17. Dahunsi, 2022, Valorization of pineapple peel and poultry manure for clean energy generation, Food Energy Secur., 11, 1, 10.1002/fes3.228 · DOI
  18. Dahunsi, 2019, Co-digestion of Theobroma cacao (Cocoa) pod husk and poultry manure for energy generation: effects of pretreatment methods, Bioresour. Technol., 283, 229, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.093 · DOI
  19. Dasgupta, 2019, Enhancement of biogas production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste using hydrothermal pretreatment, Bioresour. Technol. Reports, 7, 100281, 10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100281 · DOI
  20. Gaballah, 2020, Enhancement of biogas production from rape straw using different co-pretreatment techniques and anaerobic co-digestion with cattle manure, Bioresour. Technol., 309, 123311, 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123311 · DOI
  21. González, 2014, Effect of liquid hot water pre-treatment on sugarcane press mud methane yield, Bioresour. Technol., 169, 284, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.107 · DOI
  22. Gupta, 2016, Current status of cow dung as a bioresource for sustainable development, Bioresour. Bioprocess., 3, 10.1186/s40643-016-0105-9 · DOI
  23. Hagos, 2017, Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: progress, challenges and perspectives, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 76, 1485, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.184 · DOI
  24. Hamzah, M.H., Bowra, S., Simmons, M., Cox, P., 2016. The Impact of Process Parameters on the Purity And Chemical Properties Of Lignin Extracted from Miscanthus x giganteus Using a Modified Organosolv Method, in: 24th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition. pp. 1754–1759.
  25. Jin, 2018, Performance enhancement by rumen cultures in anaerobic co-digestion of corn straw with pig manure, Biomass Bioenergy, 115, 120, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.05.001 · DOI
  26. Kainthola, 2020, Optimization of process parameters for accelerated methane yield from anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and food waste, Renew. Energy, 149, 1352, 10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.124 · DOI
  27. Kainthola, 2019, Optimization of methane production during anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and hydrilla verticillata using response surface methodology, Fuel, 235, 92, 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.094 · DOI
  28. Kainthola, 2019, Fungal pretreatment and associated kinetics of rice straw hydrolysis to accelerate methane yield from anaerobic digestion, Bioresour. Technol., 286, 121368, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121368 · DOI
  29. Kainthola, 2019, Electrohydrolysis pretreatment methods to enhance the methane production from anaerobic digestion of rice straw using graphite electrode, Renew. Energy, 142, 1, 10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.083 · DOI
  30. Kim, 2015, Enhancement of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge by hydrothermal pre-treatment, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 101, 42, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.03.025 · DOI
  31. Lachos-Perez, 2017, Applications of subcritical and supercritical water conditions for extraction, hydrolysis, gasification, and carbonization of biomass: a critical review, Biofuel Res. J., 4, 611, 10.18331/BRJ2017.4.2.6 · DOI
  32. Li, 2015, Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and cow manure, Bioresour. Technol., 189, 319, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.033 · DOI
  33. Li, 2018, Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures with corn stover or apple pulp for enhanced biogas production, Renew. Energy, 118, 335, 10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.023 · DOI
  34. Maciel-Silva, 2019, Integration of subcritical water pretreatment and anaerobic digestion technologies for valorization of açai processing industries residues, J. Clean. Prod., 228, 1131, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.362 · DOI
  35. Maneeintr, 2018, Hydrothermal and enzymatic treatments of pineapple waste for energy production, Energy Procedia, 152, 1260, 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.09.179 · DOI
  36. Manorach, 2015, Optimization of sub-critical water pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse, Energy Procedia, 79, 937, 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.590 · DOI
  37. Meegoda, 2018, A review of the processes, parameters, and optimization of anaerobic digestion, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15, 2224, 10.3390/ijerph15102224 · DOI
  38. Neshat, 2017, Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 79, 308, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.137 · DOI
  39. Padzil, F.N.M., Ainun, Z.M.A., Abu Kassim, N., Lee, S.H., Lee, C.H., Ariffin, H., Zainudin, E.S., 2020. Chemical, Physical and Biological Treatments of Pineapple Leaf Fibres, in: Green Energy and Technology. Springer, pp. 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1416-6_5. · DOI
  40. Paudel, 2017, Pretreatment of agricultural biomass for anaerobic digestion: current state and challenges, Bioresour. Technol., 245, 1194, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.182 · DOI
  41. Pečar, 2020, Kinetics of methane production during anaerobic fermentation of chicken manure with sawdust and fungi pre-treated wheat straw, Waste Manage., 102, 170, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.046 · DOI
  42. Phuttaro, 2019, Anaerobic digestion of hydrothermally-pretreated lignocellulosic biomass: Influence of pretreatment temperatures, inhibitors and soluble organics on methane yield, Bioresour. Technol., 284, 128, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.114 · DOI
  43. Saha, 2013, Hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of corn stover for efficient ethanol production, Ind. Crops Prod., 44, 367, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.11.025 · DOI
  44. Saha, 2018, Optimization of dilute acetic acid pretreatment of mixed fruit waste for increased methane production, J. Clean. Prod., 190, 411, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.193 · DOI
  45. Sawatdeenarunat, 2015, Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and opportunities, Bioresour. Technol., 178, 178, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.103 · DOI
  46. Shamsul, 2017, Optimization of bio-methanol production from goat manure in single stage bio-reactor, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 42, 9031, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.228 · DOI
  47. Shen, 2019, Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of durian shell with chicken, dairy, and pig manures, Energy Convers. Manag., 198, 110535, 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.099 · DOI
  48. Taherzadeh, 2008, Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Wastes to Improve Ethanol and Biogas Production: A Review, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 9, 1621, 10.3390/ijms9091621 · DOI
  49. Tian, 2020, Effects of hydrothermal pretreatment on the mono- and co-digestion of waste activated sludge and wheat straw, Sci. Total Environ., 732, 139312, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139312 · DOI
  50. Timung, 2018, Subcritical water hydrolysis of spent Java Citronella biomass for production of reducing sugar, Mater. Today Proc., 5, 23128, 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.11.043 · DOI
  51. Wang, 2018, Can hydrothermal pretreatment improve anaerobic digestion for biogas from lignocellulosic biomass?, Bioresour. Technol., 249, 117, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.197 · DOI
  52. Wenjing, 2019, Effect of pre-treatments on biological methane potential of dewatered sewage sludge under dry anaerobic digestion, Ultrason. Sonochem., 52, 224, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.11.022 · DOI
  53. Yadav, 2019, Coupled treatment of lignocellulosic agricultural residues for augmented biomethanation, J. Clean. Prod., 213, 75, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.142 · DOI
  54. Zaidi, 2019, Combining microwave pretreatment with iron oxide nanoparticles enhanced biogas and hydrogen yield from green algae, Processes, 7, 24, 10.3390/pr7010024 · DOI
  55. Zhang, 2020, Effect of organic loading, feed-to-inoculum ratio, and pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of tobacco stalks, Bioresour. Technol., 298, 122474, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122474 · DOI
  56. Zheng, 2014, Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 42, 35, 10.1016/j.pecs.2014.01.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Aili Hamzah, A. F., Hamzah, M. H., Mazlan, N. I., Che Man, H., Jamali, N. S., Siajam, S. I., & Show, P. L.
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
150
Pages
98-109
ISSN
0956-053X
DOI
10.1016/j.wasman.2022.06.042
Cited by
32
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review