Enhanced in situ denitrification for a municipal well
Abstract
In 37% of small community systems in Nebraska at least one sample exceeded the drinking water standard for nitrate of 10 mg N L(-1) during the period from 1982 to 1998 (US Bureau of Reclamation, US Department of the Interior, 1999). In this experiment a daisy well system was designed to promote denitrification in the radial capture zone of a municipal well with nitrate-N levels> 10mg L(-1), and thereby bring the nitrate concentration into compliance. The remediation design consisted of eight 15 cm diameter outer perimeter reduction wells and eight 5 cm diameter inner perimeter oxidation wells which are located roughly 18 and 9 m, respectively, from the municipal well, which serves as the extraction well. Endemic microbes are stimulated by pulsing separate injections of acetate-C and nitrate contaminated water (C:N = 1.2) to enhance denitrification in the capture zone. Water was extracted from the municipal well at 6.6 L s(-1) (liters per second). A 45% nitrate reduction occurred in municipal well samples when the total acetate-C input was increased by lengthening the acetate pulse from 1.0 to 1.5 h (C:N=1.8). Nitrate concentration stabilized at about 6.3 mg NO3-N L(-1) for two weeks during alternating acetate pulse lengths. The in situ denitrification process was sustained for three months without evidence of clogging. Results from this experiment indicated that the extracted water was in compliance with respect to nitrate, nitrite, trihalomethanes, turbidity, and total and fecal coliforms; however, the total plate count exceeded the maximum permissible limit (500 cfu/mL).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Through a series of injection wells, acetate added to an aquifer decreased NO3- concentrations by 75% over a two month period.
“Through a series of injection wells, acetate was added to an aquifer and subsequent NO 3 -concentrations decreased by 75% over a two month period (Khan and Spalding, 2004).”
From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Khan and Spalding, 2004
Cites
Nitrate removal from groundwater using a denitrification wall amended with sawdust: field trial
Schipper, L., & Vojvodić‐Vuković, M. (1998) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700030025x · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall
Long, L. M., Schipper, L. A., & Bruesewitz, D. A. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.005 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Khan, I. A., & Spalding, R. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Corresponding author
- Spalding, Roy F
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 14-15
- Pages
- 3382-3388
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120803443
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Water Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
- Keywords
- in situ denitrification, nitrate removal, municipal wells, pulse injection, groundwater remediation, drinking water quality, nitrate nitrogen, nitrite, coliform bacteria, total plate count, trihalomethanes, turbidity
- MeSH terms
- Acetates, Cities, Feces, Nebraska, Nephelometry and Turbidimetry, Nitrates, Nitrites, Time Factors, Water Microbiology, Water Supply, Water Purification, Bioreactors, Trihalomethanes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review