Cited by 45Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsGroundwater flow and contamination studies

Enhanced in situ denitrification for a municipal well

Khan, Imtiyaz A, Spalding, Roy F·2004·Water Research

Abstract

In 37% of small community systems in Nebraska at least one sample exceeded the drinking water standard for nitrate of 10 mg N L(-1) during the period from 1982 to 1998 (US Bureau of Reclamation, US Department of the Interior, 1999). In this experiment a daisy well system was designed to promote denitrification in the radial capture zone of a municipal well with nitrate-N levels> 10mg L(-1), and thereby bring the nitrate concentration into compliance. The remediation design consisted of eight 15 cm diameter outer perimeter reduction wells and eight 5 cm diameter inner perimeter oxidation wells which are located roughly 18 and 9 m, respectively, from the municipal well, which serves as the extraction well. Endemic microbes are stimulated by pulsing separate injections of acetate-C and nitrate contaminated water (C:N = 1.2) to enhance denitrification in the capture zone. Water was extracted from the municipal well at 6.6 L s(-1) (liters per second). A 45% nitrate reduction occurred in municipal well samples when the total acetate-C input was increased by lengthening the acetate pulse from 1.0 to 1.5 h (C:N=1.8). Nitrate concentration stabilized at about 6.3 mg NO3-N L(-1) for two weeks during alternating acetate pulse lengths. The in situ denitrification process was sustained for three months without evidence of clogging. Results from this experiment indicated that the extracted water was in compliance with respect to nitrate, nitrite, trihalomethanes, turbidity, and total and fecal coliforms; however, the total plate count exceeded the maximum permissible limit (500 cfu/mL).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2004.04.052

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Through a series of injection wells, acetate added to an aquifer decreased NO3- concentrations by 75% over a two month period.

    “Through a series of injection wells, acetate was added to an aquifer and subsequent NO 3 -concentrations decreased by 75% over a two month period (Khan and Spalding, 2004).”

    From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Khan and Spalding, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, I. A., & Spalding, R. F.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Spalding, Roy F
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
38
Issue
14-15
Pages
3382-3388
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120803443
Cited by
45
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Keywords
in situ denitrification, nitrate removal, municipal wells, pulse injection, groundwater remediation, drinking water quality, nitrate nitrogen, nitrite, coliform bacteria, total plate count, trihalomethanes, turbidity
MeSH terms
Acetates, Cities, Feces, Nebraska, Nephelometry and Turbidimetry, Nitrates, Nitrites, Time Factors, Water Microbiology, Water Supply, Water Purification, Bioreactors, Trihalomethanes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review