The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of the ion exchange uptake of ammonium ion onto New Zealand clinoptilolite and mordenite
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment
Wang, S., & Peng, Y. (2010) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2009.10.029 · Cited by 2,441
Ammonium removal from aqueous solutions by using natural Chinese (Chende) zeolite as adsorbent
Huang, H., Xiao, X., Yan, B., & Yang, L. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.156 · Cited by 450
Application of natural zeolite clinoptilolite for the removal of ammonia in wastewater
Adam, M. R., Othman, M. H. D., Hubadillah, S. K., Abd Aziz, M. H., & Jamalludin, M. R. (2023) · Materials Today: Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.207 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Weatherley, L. R., & Miladinovic, N. D.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4305-4312
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972728650
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the ion exchange uptake of ammonium ion onto New Zealand clinoptilolite and mordenite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2004.08.026
- The paper
- Weatherley, L. R., & Miladinovic, N. D. (2004). Comparison of the ion exchange uptake of ammonium ion onto New Zealand clinoptilolite and mordenite. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.08.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
