Cited by 31Wastewater Treatment and ReuseSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment

Nitrogen transformation in a denitrification layer irrigated with dairy factory effluent

Schipper, L.A., McGill, A.·2008·Water Research

Abstract

Adoption of land-based effluent treatment systems can be constrained by the costs and availability of land. Sufficient land area is needed to ensure nitrate leaching from applied effluent is minimised. One approach to decrease required land area is to enhance N removal by denitrification. Layers of organic matter (100 mm thick) were installed below topsoil of a site irrigated with dairy factory effluent. These "denitrification" layers were tested to determine whether they could decrease nitrate leaching by increasing denitrification. Four plots (10x10 m2 each) were constructed with a denitrification layer installed at 300 mm below the surface, and N losses were measured in leachate using suction cups every 3 weeks for 19 months. N in leachate was compared with 4 control plots. Denitrifying enzyme activity, nitrate concentrations, and carbon availability were measured in samples collected from the denitrification layers. These measurements demonstrated that denitrification occurred in the layer; however, denitrification rates were not sufficiently high to significantly decrease nitrate leaching. Total N leaching was 296 kg N ha(-1) from control plots and 238 kg N ha(-1) from plots with denitrification layers; a total of 798 kg N ha(-1) was applied in effluent. More than 50% of the leached N to 40 cm was as organic N, presumably due to bypass flow. Other studies have demonstrated that thicker denitrification layers (more than 300 mm) can reduce nitrate leaching from small-scale…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2008.01.033

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A denitrification layer in New Zealand under dairy effluent-irrigated topsoils found that denitrification was not high enough to significantly limit NO3-leaching.

    “A denitrification layer located in New Zealand under dairy effluent-irrigated topsoils found that denitrification was not high enough to significantly limit NO 3 -leaching (Schipper and McGill, 2008),”

    From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Schipper and McGill, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schipper, L. A., & McGill, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Waikato (NZ)
  • Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ)
Corresponding author
Schipper, L.A.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
42
Issue
10-11
Pages
2457-2464
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091850816
Cited by
31
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Commons (University of Waikato) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Foundation for Research, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Keywords
denitrification, dairy wastewater, nitrate leaching, organic matter, denitrification enzyme activity, bypass flow, organic nitrogen, carbon availability, nitrogen removal
MeSH terms
Industrial Waste, Nitrogen, Rain, Volatilization, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review