Cited by 126Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluorine in Organic ChemistryEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Perfluorinated alkylated substances in the aquatic environment: An Austrian case study

Clara, M., Gans, O., Weiss, S., Sanz-Escribano, D., Scharf, S., Scheffknecht, C.·2009·Water Research

Abstract

Perfluorinated alkylated substances (PFAS) are of global interest due to their occurrence and persistency in the environment. This study includes surface waters and sediments for the analysis of eleven PFAS. The PFAS studied can be grouped in perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFCAs), perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFS) and perfluoroalkyl sulfonamides (PFSA). The two most important compounds are perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). These two substances showed the most significant values for surface water samples with maximum concentrations of 21 ng l(-1) for PFOA and 37 ng l(-1) for PFOS. Sediment samples from seven Austrian lakes and the river Danube were studied. Whereas PFSA and PFS were not detected in any sediment sample PFCAs were detected in most of the lake samples in concentrations up to 1.7 microg kg(-1) dry wt. PFOA, perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) were detected in all Danube river sediment samples in concentrations varying from 0.1 up to 5.1 microg kg(-1) dry wt. For the various sampling points the proportional mass flows deriving from wastewater discharges were calculated. Whereas only up to 10% of the average flow is discharged wastewater up to more than 50% of the PFAS mass flows in the rivers can be attributed to wastewater discharges. Besides wastewater different other pathways as emissions from point sources, further degradation of precursor products, runoff from contaminated sites or surface runoff as well as dry and wet deposition have to be considered as relevant sources for PFAS contamination in surface waters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2009.08.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 126

Authors
Clara, M., Gans, O., Weiss, S., Sanz-Escribano, D., Scharf, S., & Scheffknecht, C.
Affiliations
Environment Agency Austria (AT)
Corresponding author
Clara, M.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
43
Issue
18
Pages
4760-4768
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973986590
Cited by
126
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
PFAS, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, perfluoroalkyl carboxylates, perfluoroalkyl sulfonates, surface water contamination, sediment contamination, lakes, Danube River, wastewater discharge, mass flow, source apportionment, deposition
MeSH terms
Austria, Caproates, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Fresh Water, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Movements, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Geologic Sediments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review