The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cathodic degradation of antibiotics: Characterization and pathway analysis
Open accessAbstract
Antibiotics in wastewaters must be degraded to eliminate their antibacterial activity before discharging into the environment. A cathode can provide continuous electrons for the degradation of refractory pollutants, however the cathodic degradation feasibility, efficiency and pathway for different kinds of antibiotics is poorly understood. Here, we investigated the degradation of four antibiotics, namely nitrofurazone (NFZ), metronidazole (MNZ), chloramphenicol (CAP), and florfenicol (FLO) by a poised cathode in a dual chamber electrochemical reactor. The cyclic voltammetry preliminarily proved the feasibility of the cathodic degradation of these antibiotics. The cathodic reducibility of these antibiotics followed the order of NFZ > MNZ > CAP > FLO. A decreased phosphate buffered solution (PBS) concentration as low as 2 mM or utilization of NaCl buffer solution as catholyte had significant influence on antibiotics degradation rate and efficiency for CAP and FLO but not for NFZ and MNZ. PBS could be replaced by Na2CO3-NaHCO3 buffer solution as catholyte for the degradation of these antibiotics. Reductive dechlorination of CAP proceeded only after the reduction of the nitro group to aromatic amine. The composition of the degradation products depended on the cathode potential except for MNZ. The cathodic degradation process could eliminate the antibacterial activity of these antibiotics. The current study suggests that the electrochemical reduction could serve as a potential pretreatment or advanced treatment unit for the treatment of antibiotics containing wastewaters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Degradation of antibiotics by advanced oxidation processes: An overview
Wang, J., & Zhuan, R. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135023 · Cited by 1,365
Carbon-based materials as adsorbent for antibiotics removal: Mechanisms and influencing factors
Xiang, Y., Xu, Z., Wei, Y., Zhou, Y., Yang, X., Yang, Y., Yang, J., Zhang, J., Luo, L., & Zhou, Z. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.068 · Cited by 429
Kumar, A., Kumar, A., Sharma, G., Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., Naushad, M., Ghfar, A. A., & Stadler, F. J. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.049 · Cited by 369
Jiang, W.-L., Xia, X., Han, J.-L., Ding, Y.-C., Haider, M. R., & Wang, A.-J. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b01894 · Cited by 293
Self-citationCui, M.-H., Cui, D., Gao, L., Cheng, H.-Y., & Wang, A.-J. (2016) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.135 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kong, D., Liang, B., Yun, H., Cheng, H., Ma, J., Cui, M., Wang, A., & Ren, N.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 281-292
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027839280
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cathodic degradation of antibiotics: Characterization and pathway analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.025
- The paper
- Kong, D., Liang, B., Yun, H., Cheng, H., Ma, J., Cui, M., Wang, A., & Ren, N. (2015). Cathodic degradation of antibiotics: Characterization and pathway analysis. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.