Cited by 179Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal

Influence of microalgal N and P composition on wastewater nutrient remediation

Open access
Whitton, Rachel, Le Mével, Amandine, Pidou, Marc, Ometto, Francesco, Villa, Raffaella, Jefferson, Bruce·2016·Water Research

Abstract

Microalgae have demonstrated the ability to remediate wastewater nutrients efficiently, with methods to further enhance performance through species selection and biomass concentration. This work evaluates a freshwater species remediation characteristics through analysis of internal biomass N:P (nitrogen:phosphorus) and presents a relationship between composition and nutrient uptake ability to assist in species selection. Findings are then translated to an optimal biomass concentration, achieved through immobilisation enabling biomass intensification by modifying bead concentration, for wastewaters of differing nutrient concentrations at hydraulic retention times (HRT) from 3 h to 10 d. A HRT <20 h was found suitable for the remediation of secondary effluent by immobilised Scenedesmus obliquus and Chlorella vulgaris at bead concentrations as low as 3.2 and 4.4 bead·mL(-1). Increasing bead concentrations were required for shorter HRTs with 3 h possible at influent concentrations <5 mgP L(-1).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2015.12.054

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 179

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Oh-Hama, T., Miyachi, S., 1988. Chlorella. In: Borowitzka, M.A., Borowitzka, L.J. (Eds.), Microalgal Biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3e26.
  2. Redfield, A.C., 1934. On the Proportions of Organic Derivatives in Sea Water and Their Relation to the Composition of Plankton. James Johnstones Memorial, pp. 176e192.
  3. Reynolds, C., 2006. Ecology of Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, p. 550.

Authors
Whitton, R., Le Mével, A., Pidou, M., Ometto, F., Villa, R., & Jefferson, B.
Affiliations
  • Cranfield University (GB)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Jefferson, Bruce
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
91
Pages
371-378
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2227562444
Cited by
179
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • CERES (Cranfield University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • STREAM Industrial Doctorate Centre (EP/L015412/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Keywords
microalgae, N:P ratio, Scenedesmus obliquus, Chlorella vulgaris, biomass concentration, hydraulic retention time, secondary effluent, nutrient uptake, species selection
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Biodegradation, Environmental, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Bioreactors, Scenedesmus, Chlorella vulgaris, Microalgae, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review