The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of diclofenac by carbon quantum dots modified porous g-C3N4: Mechanisms, degradation pathway and DFT calculation
Abstract
Metal-free photocatalysts have attracted growing concern in recent years. In this work, a new class of carbon quantum dots (CQDs) modified porous graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) is synthesized via a facile polymerization method. With the optimal CQDs loading, the CQDs modified g-C3N4 exhibits ∼15 times higher degradation kinetic towards diclofenac (DCF) than that of pure g-C3N4. The enhanced photocatalytic activity can be ascribed to the improved separation of charge carriers as well as the tuned band structure. Moreover, a photosensitation-like mechanism is proposed to elucidate the photo-generated electrons transfer and reactive radicals formation. CQDs are anchored to g-C3N4 surface via C-O bond, which provide channels for the preferential transfer of photo-excited electrons on DCF molecule to the conduction band of g-C3N4. Superoxide radical (·O2-) dominates the degradation of DCF, while holes (h+) show a negligible contribution. Density functional theory (DFT) calculation successfully predicts that the sites on DCF molecule with high Fukui index (f0) are preferable to be attacked by radicals. DCF degradation pathway mainly includes ring hydroxylation, ring closure and C-N bond cleavage processes. Acute toxicity estimation indicates the formation of less toxic intermediates/products compared to DCF after photocatalysis. Moreover, the hybrid photocatalysts exhibit good reusability in five consecutive cycles. This work not only proposes a deep insight into photosensitation-like mechanism in the photocatalysis system by using C3N4-based materials, but also develops new photocatalysts for potential application on removal of emerging organic pollutants from waters and wastewaters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reactive Species in Advanced Oxidation Processes: Formation, Identification and Reaction Mechanism
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126158 · Cited by 1,585
Chen, F., Huang, G.-X., Yao, F.-B., Yang, Q., Zheng, Y.-M., Zhao, Q.-B., & Yu, H.-Q. (2020) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.115559 · Cited by 459
Yang, Y., Zeng, G., Huang, D., Zhang, C., He, D., Zhou, C., Wang, W., Xiong, W., Li, X., Li, B., et al. (2020) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118970 · Cited by 412
Wang, S., Liu, Y., & Wang, J. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c03256 · Cited by 412
Synthesis of carbon-based nanomaterials and their application in pollution management
Liu, Z., Ling, Q., Cai, Y., Xu, L., Su, J., Yu, K., Wu, X., Xu, J., Hu, B., & Wang, X. (2022) · Nanoscale Advances · doi:10.1039/d1na00843a · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, W., Li, Y., Liu, F., Jiang, W., Zhang, D., & Liang, J.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 8-19
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903190392
- Cited by
- 777
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of diclofenac by carbon quantum dots modified porous g-C3N4: Mechanisms, degradation pathway and DFT calculation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2018.11.084
- The paper
- Liu, W., Li, Y., Liu, F., Jiang, W., Zhang, D., & Liang, J. (2019). Visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of diclofenac by carbon quantum dots modified porous g-C3N4: Mechanisms, degradation pathway and DFT calculation. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.11.084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.