Cited by 31Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsWater Treatment and DisinfectionAdvanced oxidation water treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Influences of the micropollutant erythromycin on cyanobacteria treatment with potassium permanganate

Abstract

Cyanobacteria blooms and micropollutants (e.g., antibiotics) in source waters are two increasing environmental issues worldwide. This study hypothesized that the coexisting antibiotics may possibly alter the efficiency of water treatment processes through affecting the physiological and biochemical characteristics of cyanobacterial cells. A toxic strain of Microcystis aeruginosa was exposed to the common antibiotic erythromycin (ERY) at environmentally relevant concentrations; then, samples were collected on days 1, 4 and 6 to assess the efficiency of potassium permanganate (KMnO 4) in cyanobacteria oxidation. The percentage of intact cells remained constant after treatment with 2 mg L-1 KMnO 4 in M. aeruginosa samples dosed with 0-5.0 μg L-1 ERY. Although 6 mg L-1 KMnO 4 could damage cyanobacterial cells, its ability was considerably reduced as the concentrations of ERY increased. KMnO 4 oxidation degraded the intracellular microcystins (MCs) in all of the cyanobacterial samples, even the samples with intact cells, possibly resulting from the stimulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). The highest amounts of total MCs remained after oxidation with 2 and 6 mg L-1 KMnO 4 in 0.2 μg L-1 ERY-treated cyanobacterial samples, which may be due to large amounts of MC production. The 5.0 μg L-1 ERY inhibited the growth of cyanobacterial cells and downregulated the expression of the MC synthesis gene (mcyB), which resulted in the lowest amounts of total MCs. However, it led to the highest concentration (4.6 μg L-1) of extracellular MCs after treatment with 2 mg L-1 KMnO 4 for 300 min. Generally, this study indicates that the effectiveness of KMnO 4 oxidation in cyanobacteria treatment decreased when the concentration of ERY increased. Hence, the possible risks caused by the coexistence of cyanobacteria and antibiotics, such as reduced efficiency of water treatment processes in cyanobacteria inactivation and degradation of the dissolved MCs, need to be taken into account.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115786

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 31

Metadata

Authors
Lin, S., Yu, X., Fang, J., & Fan, J.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Fan, Jiajia
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
177
Pages
115786
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016120891
Cited by
31
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
Keywords
erythromycin, potassium permanganate, Microcystis aeruginosa, cyanobacteria, microcystins, reactive oxygen species, cyanobacterial blooms, water treatment
MeSH terms
Cyanobacteria, Erythromycin, Potassium Permanganate, Water Purification, Microcystis, Microcystins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influences of the micropollutant erythromycin on cyanobacteria treatment with potassium permanganate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115786
The paper
Lin, S., Yu, X., Fang, J., & Fan, J. (2020). Influences of the micropollutant erythromycin on cyanobacteria treatment with potassium permanganate. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115786