The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tracking nitrate and sulfate sources in groundwater of an urbanized valley using a multi-tracer approach combined with a Bayesian isotope mixing model
Open accessAbstract
Over the past decades, groundwater quality has deteriorated worldwide by nitrate pollution due to the intensive use of fertilizers in agriculture, release of untreated urban sewage and industrial wastewater, and atmospheric deposition. Likewise, groundwater is increasingly polluted by sulfate due to the release of domestic, municipal and industrial wastewaters, as well as through geothermal processes, seawater intrusion, atmospheric deposition, mineral dissolution, and acid rain. The urbanized and industrialized Monterrey valley has a long record of elevated nitrate and sulfate concentrations in groundwater with multiple potential pollution sources. This study aimed to track different sources and transformation processes of nitrate and sulfate pollution in Monterrey using a suite of chemical and isotopic tracers (δ2H–H2O, δ18O–H2O, δ15N–NO3, δ18O–NO3 δ34S–SO4, δ18O–SO4) combined with a probability isotope mixing model. Soil nitrogen and sewage were found to be the most important nitrate sources, while atmospheric deposition, marine evaporites and sewage were the most prominent sulfate sources. However, the concentrations of nitrate and sulfate were controlled by denitrification and sulfate reduction processes in the transition and discharge zones. The approach followed in this study is useful for establishing effective pollution management strategies in contaminated aquifers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stable isotopes in precipitation
Dansgaard, W. (1964) · Tellus · doi:10.1111/j.2153-3490.1964.tb00181.x · Cited by 8,369
(2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-1-28473-5 · Cited by 3,828
Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-3882 · Cited by 3,809
Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology
Clark, I. D., & Fritz, P. (2013) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781482242911 · Cited by 3,498
Source Partitioning Using Stable Isotopes: Coping with Too Much Variation
Parnell, A. C., Inger, R., Bearhop, S., & Jackson, A. L. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009672 · Cited by 2,940
Camargo, J. A., & Alonso, Á. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002 · Cited by 2,248
Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too many sources
Phillips, D. L., & Gregg, J. W. (2003) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-003-1218-3 · Cited by 2,079
Isotopic Patterns in Modern Global Precipitation
Rozanski, K., Araguás-Araguás, L., & Gonfiantini, R. (2013) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1029/gm078p0001 · Cited by 1,955
Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology
(1998) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-10239-8 · Cited by 1,917
Isotopic patterns in modern global precipitation
Rozanski (1993) · Cited by 1,813
Metadata
- Authors
- Torres-Martínez, J. A., Mora, A., Knappett, P. S. K., Ornelas-Soto, N., & Mahlknecht, J.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 182
- Pages
- 115962
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3033519242
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 24.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tracking nitrate and sulfate sources in groundwater of an urbanized valley using a multi-tracer approach combined with a Bayesian isotope mixing model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115962
- The paper
- Torres-Martínez, J. A., Mora, A., Knappett, P. S. K., Ornelas-Soto, N., & Mahlknecht, J. (2020). Tracking nitrate and sulfate sources in groundwater of an urbanized valley using a multi-tracer approach combined with a Bayesian isotope mixing model. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115962
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.