Cited by 100Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

A critical review of contaminant removal by conventional and emerging media for urban stormwater treatment in the United States

Okaikue-Woodi, Fanny E. K., Cherukumilli, Katya, Ray, Jessica R.·2020·Water Research

Abstract

Stormwater is a major component of the urban water cycle contributing to street flooding and high runoff volumes in urban areas, and elevated contaminant concentrations in receiving waters from contact with impervious surfaces. Engineers and city planners are investing in best management practices to reduce runoff volume and to potentially capture and use urban stormwater. However, these current approaches result in moderate to low contaminant removal efficiencies for certain classes of contaminants (e.g., particles, nutrients, and some metals). This review describes options and opportunities to augment existing stormwater infrastructure with conventional and emerging reactive media to improve contaminant removal. This critical analysis characterizes media physicochemical properties and mechanisms contributing to contaminant removal, describes possible candidates for new engineered media, highlights lab and field studies investigating stormwater media contaminant removal, and identifies possible limitations and knowledge gaps in media implementation. Following this analysis, information is provided regarding factors that may contribute to or adversely impact urban stormwater treatment by media. The review closes with insights into additional research directions and important information necessary for safe and effective urban stormwater treatment using media.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116434

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 206 · Cited by 100

Authors
Okaikue-Woodi, F. E. K., Cherukumilli, K., & Ray, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Ray, Jessica R.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
187
Pages
116434
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087285353
Cited by
100
References
206
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Washington
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
urban stormwater treatment, reactive media, pollutant removal, stormwater infrastructure, best management practices, impervious surfaces, nutrient removal, heavy metal removal, particle removal, stormwater runoff
MeSH terms
Cities, Metals, Rain, United States, Water Supply, Water Purification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review