Expanding Ecological Assessment by Integrating Microorganisms into Routine Freshwater Biomonitoring
Open accessAbstract
Bioindication has become an indispensable part of water quality monitoring in most countries of the world, with the presence and abundance of bioindicator taxa, mostly multicellular eukaryotes, used for biotic indices. In contrast, microbes (bacteria, archaea and protists) are seldom used as bioindicators in routine assessments, although they have been recognized for their importance in environmental processes. Recently, the use of molecular methods has revealed unexpected diversity within known functional groups and novel metabolic pathways that are particularly important in energy and nutrient cycling. In various habitats, microbial communities respond to eutrophication, metals, and natural or anthropogenic organic pollutants through changes in diversity and function. In this review, we evaluated the common trends in these changes, documenting that they have value as bioindicators and can be used not only for monitoring but also for improving our understanding of the major processes in lotic and lentic environments. Current knowledge provides a solid foundation for exploiting microbial taxa, community structures and diversity, as well as functional genes, in novel monitoring programs. These microbial community measures can also be combined into biotic indices, improving the resolution of individual bioindicators. Here, we assess particular molecular approaches complemented by advanced bioinformatic analysis, as these are the most promising with respect to detailed bioindication value. We conclude that microbial community dynamics are a missing link important for our understanding of rapid changes in the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems, and should be addressed in the future environmental monitoring of freshwater ecosystems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent advances in molecular bioassessment could be used to assess microbial bioindices in receiving environments that indicate significant changes in the microbial community that could affect function.
“Recent advances in molecular bioassessment could be used to assess microbial bioindices in receiving environments that indicate significant changes in the microbial community that could affect function [122].”
From Overview and Challenges of Large-Scale Cultivation of Photosynthetic Microalgae and Cyanobacteria (2023) · cites this paper as [122]
Cites
Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers
Grill, G., Lehner, B., Thieme, M., Geenen, B., Tickner, D., Antonelli, F., Babu, S., Borrelli, P., Cheng, L., Crochetiere, H., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1111-9 · Cited by 2,473 · see citing works
Huggett, J. F., Foy, C. A., Benes, V., Emslie, K., Garson, J. A., Haynes, R., Hellemans, J., Kubista, M., Mueller, R. D., Nolan, T., et al. (2013) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2013.206375 · Cited by 859 · see citing works
Metabarcoding vs. morphological identification to assess diatom diversity in environmental studies
Zimmermann, J., Glöckner, G., Jahn, R., Enke, N., & Gemeinholzer, B. (2015) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12336 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Uyaguari-Diaz, M. I., Chan, M., Chaban, B. L., Croxen, M. A., Finke, J. F., Hill, J. E., Peabody, M. A., Van Rossum, T., Suttle, C. A., Brinkman, F. S. L., et al. (2016) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0166-1 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Overview and Challenges of Large-Scale Cultivation of Photosynthetic Microalgae and Cyanobacteria
Novoveská, L., Nielsen, S. L., Eroldoğan, O. T., Haznedaroglu, B. Z., Rinkevich, B., Fazi, S., Robbens, J., Vasquez, M., & Einarsson, H. (2023) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md21080445 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Sagova-Mareckova, M., Boenigk, J., Bouchez, A., Cermakova, K., Chonova, T., Cordier, T., Eisendle, U., Elersek, T., Fazi, S., Fleituch, T., Frühe, L., Gajdosova, M., Graupner, N., Haegerbaeumer, A., Kelly, A.-M., Kopecky, J., Leese, F., Nõges, P., Orlic, S., Panksep, K., Pawlowski, J., Petrusek, A., Piggott, J. J., Rusch, J. C., Salis, R., Schenk, J., Simek, K., Stovicek, A., Strand, D. A., Vasquez, M. I., Vrålstad, T., Zlatkovic, S., Zupancic, M., & Stoeck, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH)
- University of Geneva (CH)
- University of Salzburg (AT)
- Institute of Ecosystem Study (IT)
- Institute of Nature Conservation (PL)
- University of Kaiserslautern (DE)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- Estonian University of Life Sciences (EE)
- Charles University (CZ)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Lund University (SE)
- Norwegian Veterinary Institute (NO)
- Cyprus University of Technology (CY)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 191
- Pages
- 116767
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3113495269
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 17
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Water Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repository of the Ruđer Bošković Institute (Ruđer Bošković Institute) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Ktisis at Cyprus University of Technology (Cyprus University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DiVA (Linnaeus University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
- Sixth Framework Programme
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Keywords
- freshwater biomonitoring, microbial community diversity, eutrophication, metal contamination, organic pollutants, biotic indices, functional genes, water quality monitoring, microbial community dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Environmental Biomarkers, Biological Monitoring, Archaea, Environmental Monitoring, Fresh Water, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review