Cited by 232Microbial Community Ecology and PhysiologyEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Expanding Ecological Assessment by Integrating Microorganisms into Routine Freshwater Biomonitoring

Open access
Sagova-Mareckova, M., Boenigk, J., Bouchez, A., Cermakova, K., Chonova, T., Cordier, T., Eisendle, U., Elersek, T. +26 more·2021·Water Research

Abstract

Bioindication has become an indispensable part of water quality monitoring in most countries of the world, with the presence and abundance of bioindicator taxa, mostly multicellular eukaryotes, used for biotic indices. In contrast, microbes (bacteria, archaea and protists) are seldom used as bioindicators in routine assessments, although they have been recognized for their importance in environmental processes. Recently, the use of molecular methods has revealed unexpected diversity within known functional groups and novel metabolic pathways that are particularly important in energy and nutrient cycling. In various habitats, microbial communities respond to eutrophication, metals, and natural or anthropogenic organic pollutants through changes in diversity and function. In this review, we evaluated the common trends in these changes, documenting that they have value as bioindicators and can be used not only for monitoring but also for improving our understanding of the major processes in lotic and lentic environments. Current knowledge provides a solid foundation for exploiting microbial taxa, community structures and diversity, as well as functional genes, in novel monitoring programs. These microbial community measures can also be combined into biotic indices, improving the resolution of individual bioindicators. Here, we assess particular molecular approaches complemented by advanced bioinformatic analysis, as these are the most promising with respect to detailed bioindication value. We conclude that microbial community dynamics are a missing link important for our understanding of rapid changes in the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems, and should be addressed in the future environmental monitoring of freshwater ecosystems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116767

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent advances in molecular bioassessment could be used to assess microbial bioindices in receiving environments that indicate significant changes in the microbial community that could affect function.

    “Recent advances in molecular bioassessment could be used to assess microbial bioindices in receiving environments that indicate significant changes in the microbial community that could affect function [122].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sagova-Mareckova, M., Boenigk, J., Bouchez, A., Cermakova, K., Chonova, T., Cordier, T., Eisendle, U., Elersek, T., Fazi, S., Fleituch, T., Frühe, L., Gajdosova, M., Graupner, N., Haegerbaeumer, A., Kelly, A.-M., Kopecky, J., Leese, F., Nõges, P., Orlic, S., Panksep, K., Pawlowski, J., Petrusek, A., Piggott, J. J., Rusch, J. C., Salis, R., Schenk, J., Simek, K., Stovicek, A., Strand, D. A., Vasquez, M. I., Vrålstad, T., Zlatkovic, S., Zupancic, M., & Stoeck, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Salzburg (AT)
  • Institute of Ecosystem Study (IT)
  • Institute of Nature Conservation (PL)
  • University of Kaiserslautern (DE)
  • Bielefeld University (DE)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Estonian University of Life Sciences (EE)
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Norwegian Veterinary Institute (NO)
  • Cyprus University of Technology (CY)
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
191
Pages
116767
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3113495269
Cited by
232
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 17
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of the Ruđer Bošković Institute (Ruđer Bošković Institute) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Ktisis at Cyprus University of Technology (Cyprus University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DiVA (Linnaeus University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
  • Sixth Framework Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
freshwater biomonitoring, microbial community diversity, eutrophication, metal contamination, organic pollutants, biotic indices, functional genes, water quality monitoring, microbial community dynamics
MeSH terms
Environmental Biomarkers, Biological Monitoring, Archaea, Environmental Monitoring, Fresh Water, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review