Unraveling encapsulated growth of Nitrosomonas europaea in alginate: An experimental and modeling study
Abstract
Encapsulation is a promising technology to retain and protect autotrophs for biological nitrogen removal. One-dimensional biofilm models have been used to describe encapsulated systems; they do not, however, incorporate chemical sorption to the encapsulant nor do they adequately describe cell growth and distribution within the encapsulant. In this research we developed a new model to describe encapsulated growth and activity of Nitrosomonas europaea, incorporating ammonium sorption to the alginate encapsulant. Batch and continuous flow reactors were used to verify the simulation results. Quantitative PCR and cross-section fluorescence in situ hybridization were used to analyze the growth and spatial distribution of the encapsulated cells within alginate. Preferential growth of Nitrosomonas near the surface of the encapsulant was predicted by the model and confirmed by experiments. The modeling and experimental results also suggested that smaller encapsulants with a larger surface area to volume ratio would improve ammonia oxidation. Excessive aeration caused the breakage of the encapsulant, resulting in unpredicted microbial release and washout. Overall, our modeling approach is flexible and can be used to engineer and optimize encapsulated systems for enhanced biological nitrogen removal. Similar modeling approaches can be used to incorporate sorption of additional species within an encapsulant, additional nitrogen-converting microorganisms, and the use of other encapsulation materials.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Perez-Calleja, P., Nerenberg, R., Novak, P. J., & Ishii, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Zhiyue
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 208
- Pages
- 117857
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3212488827
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Water Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Odor and Emission Control Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Keywords
- Nitrosomonas europaea, alginate encapsulation, ammonium sorption, ammonia oxidation, biological nitrogen removal, aeration, surface-to-volume ratio, real-time PCR, fluorescence in situ hybridization
- MeSH terms
- Alginates, Ammonia, Nitrites, Nitrogen, Nitrosomonas, Oxidation-Reduction, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Bioreactors, Nitrosomonas europaea
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review