The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydroxyl radicals in anodic oxidation systems: generation, identification and quantification
Abstract
Anodic oxidation has emerged as a promising treatment technology for the removal of a broad range of organic pollutants from wastewaters. Hydroxyl radicals are the primary species generated in anodic oxidation systems to oxidize organics. In this review, the methods of identifying hydroxyl radicals and the existing debates and misunderstandings regarding the validity of experimental results are discussed. Consideration is given to the methods of quantification of hydroxyl radicals in anodic oxidation systems with particular attention to approaches used to compare the electrochemical performance of different anodes. In addition, we describe recent progress in understanding the mechanisms of hydroxyl radical generation at the surface of most commonly used anodes and the utilization of hydroxyl radical in typical electrochemical reactors. This review shows that the key challenges facing anodic oxidation technology are related to i) the elimination of mistakes in identifying hydroxyl radicals, ii) the establishment of an effective hydroxyl radical quantification method, iii) the development of cost effective anode materials with high corrosion resistance and high electrochemical activity and iv) the optimization of electrochemical reactor design to maximise the utilization efficiency of hydroxyl radicals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment – A critical review
Miklos, D. B., Remy, C., Jekel, M., Linden, K. G., Drewes, J. E., & Hübner, U. (2018) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042 · Cited by 3,050
Martínez-Huitle, C. A., & Brillas, E. (2009) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.09.017 · Cited by 2,250
Moreira, F. C., Boaventura, R. A. R., Brillas, E., & Vilar, V. J. P. (2017) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.037 · Cited by 2,144
Brillas, E., & Martínez-Huitle, C. A. (2015) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.11.016 · Cited by 2,009
Martínez-Huitle, C. A., & Ferro, S. (2006) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b517632h · Cited by 1,840
Martínez-Huitle, C. A., Rodrigo, M. A., Sirés, I., & Scialdone, O. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00361 · Cited by 1,633
Comninellis, C. (1994) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0013-4686(94)85175-1 · Cited by 1,621
Giannakis, S., Lin, K.-Y. A., & Ghanbari, F. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.127083 · Cited by 1,340
Staehelin, J., & Hoigne, J. (1985) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00142a012 · Cited by 1,192
Xu, L., & Wang, J. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es300303f · Cited by 1,130
Cited by
Ahmadi, M., Adeleye, O., Vonalt, G., & Nazemi, M. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c04748 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, J., Zhang, C., & Waite, T. D.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 217
- Pages
- 118425
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4224138398
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 116
- FWCI
- 16.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydroxyl radicals in anodic oxidation systems: generation, identification and quantification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118425
- The paper
- Xie, J., Zhang, C., & Waite, T. D. (2022). Hydroxyl radicals in anodic oxidation systems: generation, identification and quantification. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.