Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sulfide-modified zero-valent iron activated periodate for sulfadiazine removal: Performance and dominant routine of reactive species production

Ling, Chen, Wu, Shuai, Han, Jiangang, Dong, Tailu, Zhu, Changqing, Li, Xiuwen, Xu, Lijie, Zhang, Ying, Zhou, Minghua, Pan, Yuwei·2022·Water Research

Abstract

In this work, sulfide-modified zero-valent iron (S-Fe0) was used to activate periodate (IO4-, PI) for sulfadiazine (SDZ) removal. 60 μM SDZ could be completely removed within only 1 min by S-Fe0/PI process. Compared with other oxidants including H2O2, peroxymonosulfate (PMS), peroxydisulfate (PDS), S-Fe0 activated PI exhibited better performance for SDZ removal but with lower Fe leaching. Compared with Fe0/PI process, S-Fe0/PI process could reduce more than 80% Fe0 and PI dosage. Inorganic ions and nature organic matters had negligible effect on SDZ removal in S-Fe0/PI system inducing its good SDZ removal efficiency in natural fresh water. 80.2% SDZ still could be removed within 2 min after 7th run. S-Fe0/PI process also exhibited 2.5 - 20.1 folds enhancement for various pollutants removal compared with Fe0/PI process. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), electrochemical tests, and density functional theory (DFT) calculation were conducted to confirm the presence of sulfurs could enhance the reactivity of S-Fe0 thus increased the efficiency of PI activation for antibiotics removal. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR) tests, radical quenching experiments, quantitative detection and DFT calculation were performed to illustrate the role of multiple reactive species in SDZ removal and the dominant pathway of multiple reactive species production. IO3·, ·OH, O2-·, 1O2, FeIV, and SO4·- all participated in SDZ removal. ·OH played the major role in SDZ removal and the dominant routine of ·OH production was IO4- → O2-· → H2O2 → ·OH. Meanwhile, S-Fe0/PI process could efficiently mineralize SDZ and reduce the toxicity. Comparison with other PI activation approaches and SDZ treatment techniques further demonstrated S-Fe0 was an efficient catalyst for PI activation and present study process was a promising approach for antibiotics removal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118676

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Metadata

Authors
Ling, C., Wu, S., Han, J., Dong, T., Zhu, C., Li, X., Xu, L., Zhang, Y., Zhou, M., & Pan, Y.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
220
Pages
118676
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281560188
Cited by
253
References
42
FWCI
14.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfide-modified zero-valent iron activated periodate for sulfadiazine removal: Performance and dominant routine of reactive species production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118676
The paper
Ling, C., Wu, S., Han, J., Dong, T., Zhu, C., Li, X., Xu, L., Zhang, Y., Zhou, M., & Pan, Y. (2022). Sulfide-modified zero-valent iron activated periodate for sulfadiazine removal: Performance and dominant routine of reactive species production. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118676

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.