Cited by 25Water Resource Management and QualityWater Governance and InfrastructurePublic Health and Environmental Issues

Making waves: mental health impacts of inadequate drinking water services—From sidenote to research focus

Open access
Toivettula, A., Varis, O., Vahala, R., Juvakoski, A.·2023·Water Research

Abstract

The paramount significance of the harmful impacts of poor drinking water services on physical health have been recognized for decades. Besides, over the past twenty years, an additional body of literature on their negative mental health impacts has emerged. With this brief review, we summarise the findings of the scholarship to advance addressing overall health (physical, mental, and social) in the water sector. We furthermore review the key policy documents of this field with a focus on mental health aspects and give recommendations for practitioners and decision-makers on addressing mental health in water service delivery. We reviewed the existing published works (42) assessing psychological impacts of deficient drinking water services in low-income settings. We then identified and compared the different mechanisms causing negative mental health outcomes described in them. For these purposes, we used a water insecurity experience -model and the vulnerability-stress model of clinical psychology. Next, we probed key international and national guiding documents of the water sector to analyse how mental health issues resulting from poor services are addressed today. We found that according to the literature, poor quality and quantity of water was predictably one of the most important psychosocial stressors to users. Surprisingly, however, various kinds of water-service-related inequalities (e.g. between genders, communities or socio-economic groups) showed up as equally significant stressors. Our analysis with the vulnerability-stress model furthermore indicates that insufficient drinking water services may predispose to common mental disorders particularly through external stress. Existing field guidelines have evolved to highlight the values of non-discrimination and participation, whilst mental health aspects remain ignored. This should not be the case. Therefore, practices for addressing mental health effectively in documentation and water service development should be further researched. But already in the light of the existing literature, we urge stakeholders to focus more on the negative mental health impacts of unequal service provision for users and nearby people left without improved services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120335

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 25

Authors
Toivettula, A., Varis, O., Vahala, R., & Juvakoski, A.
Affiliations
Aalto University (FI)
Corresponding author
  • Toivettula, A.
  • Juvakoski, A.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
243
Pages
120335
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384007948
Cited by
25
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Aalto-Yliopisto
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Public Health and Environmental Issues
Keywords
mental health, drinking water services, water insecurity, psychosocial stressors, vulnerability-stress model, gender inequality, socioeconomic disparities, water quantity and quality, common mental disorders, water policy, water service delivery, low-income settings
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review