Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Journal of Applied Physiology

·2012·Wilderness & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

and calisthenics (20.4%).Although the majority of patients visiting the ED for heat illness were discharged (91.9%), 7.1% were either hospitalized or transferred to higher care, with hospitalization being most common among males and patients aged more than 55 years.Heat illness is a recognized threat to persons participating in sports and recreational activity.This analysis from the CDC provided epidemiologic information regarding heat illness that might be used for educational purposes, targeting persons 15 to 19 years old, more than 55 years old, males, coaches, and parents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wem.2011.11.007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Venue
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Published
2012-03
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
90-90
ISSN
  • 1080-6032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-1534
OpenAlex
W4254464567
Cited by
369
References
0
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Journal of Applied Physiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wem.2011.11.007
The paper
Journal of Applied Physiology. (2012). Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2011.11.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.