The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—Comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research
Open accessAbstract
Today, depending on topic, goal and budget, all kinds of sampling methods are being used, in order to collect consumer data for research in the wine business. However, it is questionable which survey method is able to generate data that does represent the entire population. A representative face-to-face survey with 2000 respondents and a telephone survey with 1000 respondents were compared with two online surveys, one based on quota sampling (2000) and the other on snowball sampling (3000) using identical questions. Due to the sampling method, three of the surveys were representative of the socio-demographic structure of the German population in terms of six demographic variables that were selected for the quota sampling. The online survey (based on the snowball sample) had large biases concerning representativeness. Regarding the behavioural characteristics of consumers, the face-to-face data delivered the best results, followed by the telephone interviews and finally the online quota survey. Face-to-face surveys still deliver the most representative results. Telephone surveys may provide a good alternative, but we would advise use of a larger sample. The online quota survey needs to be corrected, while in the case of snowball sampling, one should relinquish representativeness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
Chisnall, P. M. (2007) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/s0021849907070232 · Cited by 3,219
Marketing Research: An Applied Approach
Malhotra, N. K., Nunan, D., & Birks, D. F. (2000) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 2,660
Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2005) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662240510590360 · Cited by 1,653
Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity
Kreuter, F., Presser, S., & Tourangeau, R. (2008) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfn063 · Cited by 1,220
National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet
Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2009) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfp075 · Cited by 955
Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires
Holbrook, A. L., Green, M. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2003) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/346010 · Cited by 916
Yeager, D. S., Krosnick, J. A., Chang, L., Javitz, H. S., Levendusky, M. S., Simpser, A., & Wang, R. (2011) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfr020 · Cited by 758
Measurement Errors in Surveys.
Vogel, F. A., Biemer, P. P., Groves, R. M., Lyberg, L. E., Mathiowetz, N. A., & Sudman, S. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290676 · Cited by 697
Conducting Research Surveys via E-mail and the Web
(2002) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/mr1480 · Cited by 597
Cited by
Udmale, P., Ichikawa, Y., Manandhar, S., Ishidaira, H., & Kiem, A. S. (2014) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.011 · Cited by 357
The many faces of sustainability-conscious consumers: a category-independent typology
Balderjahn, I., Peyer, M., Seegebarth, B., Wiedmann, K.-P., & Weber, A. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.022 · Cited by 151
Sallie, S. N., Ritou, V., Bowden-Jones, H., & Voon, V. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044276 · Cited by 130
Hypothetical bias mitigation in representative and convenience samples
Penn, J. M., Petrolia, D. R., & Fannin, J. M. (2023) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1002/aepp.13374 · Cited by 42
Hodes, L. N., Oosthuizen, J., Henry, M., & Thomas, K. G. F. (2022) · Development Southern Africa · doi:10.1080/0376835x.2021.2003757 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Szolnoki, G., & Hoffmann, D.
- Venue
- Wine Economics and Policy
- Publisher
- Firenze University Press
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 57-66
- ISSN
- 2212-9774 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005920887
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 44.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—Comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wep.2013.10.001
- The paper
- Szolnoki, G., & Hoffmann, D. (2013). Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—Comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research. Wine Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2013.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
