Cited by 42Sex and Gender in HealthcarePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareDiversity and Career in Medicine

Women and Men with Coronary Heart Disease in Three Countries: Are They Treated Differently?

Open access
Bönte, Markus, von dem Knesebeck, Olaf, Siegrist, Johannes, Marceau, Lisa, Link, Carol, Arber, Sara, Adams, Ann, McKinlay, John B.·2008·Women's Health Issues

Abstract

Background Nonmedical determinants of medical decision making were investigated in an international research project in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany. The key question in this paper is whether and to what extent doctors' diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in coronary heart disease (CHD) are influenced by patient gender. Methods A factorial experiment with a videotaped patient consultation was conducted. Professional actors played the role of patients with symptoms of CHD. Several alternative versions were taped featuring the same script with patient-actors of different gender, age, race, and socioeconomic status. The videotapes were presented to a randomly selected sample of 128 primary care physicians in each country. Using an interview with standardized and open-ended questions, physicians were asked how they would diagnose and treat such a patient after they had seen the video. Results Results show gender differences in the diagnostic strategies of the doctors. Women were asked different questions, CHD was mentioned more often as a possible diagnosis for men than for women, and physicians were less certain about their diagnosis with female patients. Gender differences in management decisions (therapy and lifestyle advice) are less pronounced and less consistent than in diagnostic decisions. Magnitude of gender effect on doctors' decisions varies between countries with smaller influences in the United States. Conclusion Although patients with identical symptoms were presented, primary care doctors' behavior differed by patients' gender in all 3 countries under study. These gender differences suggest that women may be less likely to receive an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment than men.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.whi.2008.01.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Böntea 2008 found gender differences in the diagnostic strategies of the doctors.

    “Results showed gender differences in the diagnostic strategies of the doctors.”
  • Many assumption studies attempted to make their vignettes as realistic as possible by having them validated by clinicians and by having participants view/read the vignettes as part of a normal day at work.

    “many of the assumption studies attempted to make their vignettes as realistic as possible by having them validated by clinicians [25–41] and also by having participants view/read the vignettes as part of a normal day at work [27–36, 39, 41].”
  • Eight articles appeared to refer to the same data collected in a single cross-country comparison study, and a further two articles analysed the same data.

    “eight articles appeared to refer to the same data collected in a single cross-country comparison study [27–32, 34, 35] and a further two articles analysed the same data [45, 47].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Adams, A., Buckingham, C.D., Lindenmeyer, A., McKinlay, J.B., Link, C., Marceau, L. & Arber, S. (2007). The influence of patient and doctor gender on diagnosing coronary heart disease. Sociology of Health and Illness, 29(2). Retrieved September 5, 2007, from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/shil/0/0 Anand, S.S., Xie, C.C., & Mehta, S. (2005). Differences in the management and prognosis of women and men who suffer from acute coronary syndromes. Journal of the American College of Cardiology , 46, 1845-1851. Arber, S., McKinlay, J.B., Adams, A., Marceau, L., Link, C., & O'Donnell, A. (2004). Influence of patient characteristics on doctors' questioning and lifestyle advice for coronary heart disease: A UK/US video experiment. British Journal of General Practice , 54, 673-678. Arber, S., McKinlay, J.B., Adams, A., Marceau, L., Link, C., & O'Donnell A. (2006). Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors' diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD: A video-simulation experiment. Social Science & Medicine , 62, 103-115. Blendon, R.J., Schoen, C., DesRoches, C., Osborn, R., & Zapert, K. (2003). Common Concerns amid Diverse Systems: Health Care Experiences in Five Countries. Health Affairs, 22, 106-21. Confronting Competing Demands to Improve Quality: A Five- Country Hospital Survey.
  2. Marcus, G.M., Cohen, J., Varosy, P.D., Vessey, J., Rose, E., Massie, B.M., et al. (2007). The utility of gestures in patients with chest discomfort. The American Journal of Medicine , 120, 83-90.
  3. McKinlay, J.B., Lin, T., Freund, K., & Moskowitz, M. (2002). The unexpected influence of physician attributes on clinical decisions: Results of an experiment. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 43, 92-106.
  4. McKinlay, J.B., Link, C.L., Freund, K.M., Marceau, L.D., O'Donnell, A.B., & Lutfey, K.L. (2007). Sources of variation in physician adherence with clinical guidelines: results from a factorial experiment. Journal of General Internal Medicine , 22, 289-96.
  5. Mendelsohn, M.E. (2002). The protective effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system. American Journal of Cardiology , 89, 12-17.
  6. Peabody, J.W., Luck, J., Glassman, P., Dresselhaus, T.R., & Lee, M. (2000). Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: A Prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. The Journal of the American Medical Association , 283, 17151722.
  7. Raine, R. (2000). Does gender bias exist in the use of specialist health care? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy , 5, 237-249.
  8. Rossouw, J.E., Prentice, R.L., Manson, J.E., Wu, L., Barad, D., Barnabei, V.L., et al. (2007). Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease by age and years since Menopause. Journal of the American Medical Association , 297, 1465-1477.
  9. , W4.487, 487-503. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2006). Gesundheit in Deutschland. Berlin: Robert Koch Institut. Tunstall-Pedoe, H., Morrison, C., Woodward, M., Fitzpatrick, B., & Watt, G. (1996). Sex differences in myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the Scottish MONICA population of Glasgow 1985-1991. Circulation , 93, 1981-92. Van Ryn, M., Fu, S.S. (2003) Paved with good intentions: do public health and human service providers contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in health? American Journal of Public Health , 93, 248-55. Yusuf, S., Hawken, S., Ounpuu, S., Dans, T., Avezum, A., Lanas, F., et al. (2004). Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bönte, M., von dem Knesebeck, O., Siegrist, J., Marceau, L., Link, C., Arber, S., Adams, A., & McKinlay, J. B.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • New England Research Institutes (US)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Bönte, Markus
Venue
Women's Health Issues
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
191-198
ISSN
1049-3867 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031310527
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Women s Health Issues (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG 16747, R01AG016747)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
coronary artery disease, gender differences in care, treatment decision-making, primary care physicians, gender bias in medicine, women's health, cross-national comparison, diagnostic uncertainty, lifestyle advice
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Coronary Disease, Female, Germany, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Play and Playthings, Primary Health Care, United States, Videotape Recording, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Sex Distribution, Patient-Centered Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review