Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reevaluating the Relationship Between Prenatal Employment and Birth Outcomes: A Policy-Relevant Application of Propensity Score Matching

Kozhimannil, Katy B., Attanasio, Laura B., McGovern, Patricia M., Gjerdingen, Dwenda K., Johnson, Pamela Jo·2013·Women's Health Issues
DOI 10.1016/j.whi.2012.11.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.whi.2012.11.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Andridge, 2010, A review of hot deck imputation for survey non-response, International Statistical Review, 78, 40, 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x · DOI
  2. Angood, 2010, Blueprint for action: Steps toward a high-quality, high-value maternity care system, Women’s Health Issues, 20, S18, 10.1016/j.whi.2009.11.007 · DOI
  3. Ashton, 2010, Elective delivery at less than 39 weeks, Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 22, 506, 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283404eb4 · DOI
  4. Austin, 2008, A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003, Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2037, 10.1002/sim.3150 · DOI
  5. Baker, 2008, Maternal employment, breastfeeding, and health: Evidence from maternity leave mandates, Journal of Health Economics, 27, 871, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.006 · DOI
  6. Becker, 1965, Theory of the allocation of time, The Economic Journal, 75, 493, 10.2307/2228949 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bell, 2008, Maternal work and birth outcome disparities, Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12, 415, 10.1007/s10995-007-0264-6 · DOI
  8. Bonzini, 2007, Risk of prematurity, low birthweight and pre-eclampsia in relation to working hours and physical activities: A systematic review, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64, 228, 10.1136/oem.2006.026872 · DOI
  9. Braitman, 2002, Rare outcomes, common treatments: Analytic strategies using propensity scores, Annals of Internal Medicine, 137, 693, 10.7326/0003-4819-137-8-200210150-00015 · DOI
  10. Chollet, 1996, The cost of poor birth outcomes in employer-sponsored health plans, Medical Care, 1219, 10.1097/00005650-199612000-00007 · DOI
  11. D'Agostino, 1998, Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group, Statistics in Medicine, 2281, 2265, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  12. Declercq, 2008, Mothers’ reports of postpartum pain associated with vaginal and cesarean deliveries: Results of a national survey, Birth, 35, 16, 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00207.x · DOI
  13. Declercq, 2009, Hospital practices and women's likelihood of fulfilling their intention to exclusively breastfeed, American Journal of Public Health, 99, 929, 10.2105/AJPH.2008.135236 · DOI
  14. Goldenberg, 2008, Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth, Lancet, 371, 75, 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Jansen, 2012, Employment status and the risk of pregnancy complications: The Generation R Study, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 67, 387, 10.1136/oem.2009.046300 · DOI
  16. Johnson, 2008, Neighborhood poverty and American Indian infant death: Are the effects identifiable?, Annals of Epidemiology, 18, 552, 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.02.007 · DOI
  17. Lawson, 2009, Occupational factors and risk of preterm birth in nurses, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 200, 51e51, 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.006 · DOI
  18. Maldonado, 2002, Estimating causal effects, International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 422, 10.1093/ije/31.2.422 · DOI
  19. Mander, 1999, Hotdeck imputation, Stata Technical Bulletin, 51, 32
  20. Martin, 2010, Births: Final data for 2008, National Vital Statistics Reports, 59, 1
  21. Martin, 2007, Births: final data for 2005, National Vital Statistics Reports, 56, 1
  22. McGovern, 2006, Postpartum health of employed mothers 5 weeks after childbirth, Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 159, 10.1370/afm.519 · DOI
  23. Mercer, 1996, The preterm prediction study: A clinical risk assessment system, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 174, 1885, 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70225-9 · DOI
  24. Naeye, 1982, Working during pregnancy: Effects on the fetus, Pediatrics, 69, 724, 10.1542/peds.69.6.724 · DOI
  25. Peoples-Sheps, 1991, Characteristics of maternal employment during pregnancy: Effects on low birthweight, American Journal of Public Health, 81, 1007, 10.2105/AJPH.81.8.1007 · DOI
  26. Reilly, 1993, Data analysis using hot deck multiple imputation, The Statistician, 307, 10.2307/2348810 · DOI
  27. Rubin, 1997, Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores, Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 757, 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_Part_2-199710151-00064 · DOI
  28. Russell, 2007, Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States, Pediatrics, 120, e1, 10.1542/peds.2006-2386 · DOI
  29. Saurel-Cubizolles, 2004, Employment, working conditions, and preterm birth: Results from the Europop case-control survey, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, 395, 10.1136/jech.2003.008029 · DOI
  30. Tatano Beck, 2011, Postpartum depressive symptomatology: Results from a two-stage US national survey, The Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 56, 427, 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00090.x · DOI
  31. Taylor, 2001, Touchdown! Online polling scores big in November 2000, Public Perspective, 12, 38
  32. Teitelman, 1990, Effect of maternal work activity on preterm birth and low birth weight, American Journal of Epidemiology, 131, 104, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115463 · DOI
  33. Terhanian, 2000, Correcting data from online surveys for the effects of nonrandom selection and nonrandom assignment, Harris Interactive White Paper, 1
  34. Tita, 2009, Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes, New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 111, 10.1056/NEJMoa0803267 · DOI
  35. Young, 2010, Implications of subdividing marital status: Are unmarried mothers with partners different from unmarried mothers without partners? An exploratory analysis, Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14, 209, 10.1007/s10995-009-0450-9 · DOI

Cited by

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Kozhimannil, K. B., Attanasio, L. B., McGovern, P. M., Gjerdingen, D. K., & Johnson, P. J.
Venue
Women's Health Issues
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
e77-e85
ISSN
1049-3867
DOI
10.1016/j.whi.2012.11.004
Cited by
7
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • University of Minnesota
  • Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (K12HD055887)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
  • Office of Research on Women's Health, and the National Institute on Aging, at the National Institutes of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reevaluating the Relationship Between Prenatal Employment and Birth Outcomes: A Policy-Relevant Application of Propensity Score Matching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.whi.2012.11.004
The paper
Kozhimannil, K. B., Attanasio, L. B., McGovern, P. M., Gjerdingen, D. K., & Johnson, P. J. (2013). Reevaluating the Relationship Between Prenatal Employment and Birth Outcomes: A Policy-Relevant Application of Propensity Score Matching. Women's Health Issues. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2012.11.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.