Cited by 55Reproductive Health and ContraceptionHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Connecting Knowledge about Abortion and Sexual and Reproductive Health to Belief about Abortion Restrictions: Findings from an Online Survey

Kavanaugh, Megan L., Bessett, Danielle, Littman, Lisa L., Norris, Alison·2013·Women's Health Issues

Abstract

Background The objective of this research was to examine individuals' knowledge about abortion in the context of their knowledge about other sexual and reproductive health (SRH) issues, including contraception, abortion, pregnancy, and birth. Methods During August 2012, we administered an online questionnaire to a randomly selected sample of 639 men and women of reproductive age (18-44 years) in the United States. Findings Respondents reported the highest levels of perceived knowledge about SRH in general (81%), followed by pregnancy and birth (53%), contraception (48%), and abortion (35%); knowledge of specific items within each of these areas paralleled this pattern. Respondents who believe that abortion should be allowed in at least some circumstances were more likely to be correct regarding the safety and consequences of contraception and abortion. Characteristics associated with higher levels of knowledge regarding abortion-related issues included having higher levels of knowledge about non-abortion-related SRH issues and having less restrictive abortion beliefs. Conclusions Women and men are not well-informed about the relative safety and consequences of SRH-related experiences. Many overestimate their knowledge, and personal beliefs about abortion restrictions may influence their knowledge about the safety and consequences of abortion and contraception. Providers of SRH services should provide comprehensive evidence-based information about the risks and consequences of SRH matters during consultations, particularly in the case of abortion providers serving women who hold more restrictive abortion beliefs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.whi.2013.04.003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kavanaugh et al. (2013) found poor sexual and reproductive health knowledge among a random sample of adults.

    “Kavanaugh et al. (2013) similarly found poor sexual and reproductive health knowledge among a random sample of adults.”

    From Sex Education Among Recent High School Graduates (2025) · cites this paper as Kavanaugh et al. (2013)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Sex Education Among Recent High School Graduates

    Mollen, D., Klann, E. M., Hinton, M., Vidican, M., & Romines, A. (2025) · Sexuality Research and Social Policy · doi:10.1007/s13178-024-01041-z · Cited by 6 · see citing works

    “Given that abortion rates have declined since Kavanaugh et al. (2013) designed their instrument, we reworded the correct response to the question, “What percentage of women in the United States will have had an abortion by the age of 45?” from 33 to 25% (Jones & Jerman, 2017).”

Authors
Kavanaugh, M. L., Bessett, D., Littman, L. L., & Norris, A.
Affiliations
  • Guttmacher Institute (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kavanaugh, Megan L.
Venue
Women's Health Issues
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
e239-e247
ISSN
1049-3867 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090409681
Cited by
55
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women s Health Issues (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
abortion knowledge, sexual and reproductive health, abortion restrictions, contraceptive knowledge, perceived knowledge, pregnancy, births, health information needs
MeSH terms
Abortion, Induced, Adolescent, Adult, Contraception, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, United States, Logistic Models, Internet, Reproductive Health Services, Young Adult, Reproductive Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review