Cited by 76Electrolyte and hormonal disordersTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Hyponatremia in patients with traumatic brain injury: etiology, incidence, and severity correlation

Lohani, Subash, Devkota, Upendra Prasad·2011·World Neurosurgery

Abstract

Background Hyponatremia is common in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aims at ascertaining the incidence of hyponatremia in TBI with its etiologic diagnosis, biochemical confirmation, and severity correlation with initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and computed tomography (CT) abnormality. Methods All patients more than 20 years old with severe and moderate TBI and the mild ones with CT abnormality were included. Daily sodium level was monitored for 14 days. Central venous pressure (CVP) was measured for assessment of volume status. Fractional excretion of uric acid (FEUA) was measured in all patients with hyponatremia, both before and after its correction. Results Of 40 consecutive patients, 33 remained for analysis. Hyponatremia was seen in 9 (27.2%) patients, of whom 6 developed it within the first week. Mean duration of hyponatremia was 1.78 days. We found that 5 patients had an elevated CVP consistent with the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH), whereas 3 had low CVP consistent with cerebral salt wasting syndrome (CSWS) and 1 had an equivocal reading. Measurement of FEUA did not show consistent pattern to suggest a biochemical distinction. There were 33.3% each of mild and moderate, and 16.6% of severe TBI among hyponatremic patients. Hyponatremia was seen in Rotterdam CT scores I to IV in increasing incidence (r = 0.983, P = 0.017), whereas it had no significant correlation with initial GCS (r = 0.756, P = 0.455). Conclusion…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.03.042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 76

Authors
Lohani, S., & Devkota, U. P.
Corresponding author
Lohani, Subash
Venue
World Neurosurgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
76
Issue
3-4
Pages
355-360
ISSN
1878-8750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015522022
Cited by
76
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • World Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
hyponatremia, traumatic brain injury, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, cerebral salt wasting syndrome, fractional excretion of uric acid, central venous pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, hyponatremia etiology
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Brain, Brain Injuries, Creatinine, Female, Humans, Hyponatremia, Functional Laterality, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Uric Acid, Glasgow Coma Scale, Treatment Outcome, Neurosurgical Procedures, Glasgow Outcome Scale, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review