Cited by 11Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareNursing care and research

Caregivers' perspective and burden of the end-of-life phase of patients with glioblastoma: a multicenter retrospective study

Open access
Gulino, Vincenzo, Brunasso, Lara, Avallone, Chiara, Costa, Vanessa, Adorno, Alessandro Arturo, Lombardo, Maria Cristina, Tumbiolo, Silvana, Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo +1 more·2024·World Neurosurgery

Abstract

Background Glioblastoma is the most common aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. Changes in cognition, personality, and behavior of patients as well as side effects of treatments cause unique challenges for providing care and may impact caregiver burden in different ways. Methods This retrospective study included 45 patients with a diagnosis of glioblastoma treated between January 2022 and June 2023 in 2 neurosurgical departments. We investigated the quality of life and the experiences of patients with glioblastoma and caregivers in the end-of-life phase using a validated questionnaire consisting of 38 questions related to the caregiver's view of the patient's terminal phase and another 26 questions regarding caregiver's experiences and emotions during the last 3 months of the patient's life. Results Fatigue, reduced consciousness, and sadness were the most common patient symptoms reported by their caregivers. The reported quality of life of caregivers was low and in accordance with the quality of life that they attributed to the patient. Symptoms of burnout and feelings of insufficient information emphasize the urgent need for psychological support and training dedicated to caregivers. Conclusions The end-of-life phases of patients with glioblastoma represent a critical factor that significantly affects not only the patient but also the caregiver's burden, caregiving tasks, and time. A multidisciplinary support program is needed to address and improve caregivers' burden.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.114

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 32 · Cited by 11

Authors
Gulino, V., Brunasso, L., Avallone, C., Costa, V., Adorno, A. A., Lombardo, M. C., Tumbiolo, S., Iacopino, D. G., & Maugeri, R.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo (IT)
  • University of Palermo (IT)
  • Ospedale Vincenzo Cervello (IT)
Corresponding author
Brunasso, Lara
Venue
World Neurosurgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
192
Pages
e49-e55
ISSN
1878-8750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401965971
Cited by
11
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Neurosurgery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
glioblastoma, end-of-life care, caregiver burden, caregiver quality of life, caregiver experiences, burnout, psychological support for caregivers, patient symptoms
MeSH terms
Caregiver Burden, Adult, Aged, Brain Neoplasms, Fatigue, Female, Glioblastoma, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Terminal Care, Caregivers, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review