Caregivers' perspective and burden of the end-of-life phase of patients with glioblastoma: a multicenter retrospective study
Open accessAbstract
Background Glioblastoma is the most common aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. Changes in cognition, personality, and behavior of patients as well as side effects of treatments cause unique challenges for providing care and may impact caregiver burden in different ways. Methods This retrospective study included 45 patients with a diagnosis of glioblastoma treated between January 2022 and June 2023 in 2 neurosurgical departments. We investigated the quality of life and the experiences of patients with glioblastoma and caregivers in the end-of-life phase using a validated questionnaire consisting of 38 questions related to the caregiver's view of the patient's terminal phase and another 26 questions regarding caregiver's experiences and emotions during the last 3 months of the patient's life. Results Fatigue, reduced consciousness, and sadness were the most common patient symptoms reported by their caregivers. The reported quality of life of caregivers was low and in accordance with the quality of life that they attributed to the patient. Symptoms of burnout and feelings of insufficient information emphasize the urgent need for psychological support and training dedicated to caregivers. Conclusions The end-of-life phases of patients with glioblastoma represent a critical factor that significantly affects not only the patient but also the caregiver's burden, caregiving tasks, and time. A multidisciplinary support program is needed to address and improve caregivers' burden.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Qualitative data depict caregiving as an isolating role characterised by feeling unprepared, under-informed, and insufficiently supported by health care systems.
“Qualitative data similarly depict caregiving as an isolating role characterised by feeling unprepared, under-informed, and insufficiently supported by health care systems.13”
From Caregiver burden, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes among informal caregivers of patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [13]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 32 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Gulino, V., Brunasso, L., Avallone, C., Costa, V., Adorno, A. A., Lombardo, M. C., Tumbiolo, S., Iacopino, D. G., & Maugeri, R.
- Affiliations
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo (IT)
- University of Palermo (IT)
- Ospedale Vincenzo Cervello (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Brunasso, Lara
- ORCID
- Venue
- World Neurosurgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 192
- Pages
- e49-e55
- ISSN
- 1878-8750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401965971
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- World Neurosurgery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Keywords
- glioblastoma, end-of-life care, caregiver burden, caregiver quality of life, caregiver experiences, burnout, psychological support for caregivers, patient symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Caregiver Burden, Adult, Aged, Brain Neoplasms, Fatigue, Female, Glioblastoma, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Terminal Care, Caregivers, Cost of Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review