The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English
Open accessAbstract
While cross-dialect prosodic variation has been well established for many languages, most variationist research on regional dialects of American English has focused on the vowel system. The current study was designed to explore prosodic variation in read speech in two regional varieties of American English: Southern and Midland. Prosodic dialect variation was analyzed in two domains: speaking rate and the phonetic expression of pitch movements associated with accented and phrase-final syllables. The results revealed significant effects of regional dialect on the distributions of pauses, pitch accents, and phrasal-boundary tone combinations. Significant effects of talker gender were also observed on the distributions of pitch accents and phrasal-boundary tone combinations. The findings from this study demonstrate that regional and gender identity features are encoded in part through prosody, and provide further motivation for the close examination of prosodic patterns across regional and social varieties of American English.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These and other factors may contribute to speech and language patterns37.”
From Aci-bench: a Novel Ambient Clinical Intelligence Dataset for Benchmarking Automatic Visit Note Generation (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Song, S. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-52436-2_4 · Cited by 1,457
The Atlas of North American English
Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2006) · doi:10.1515/9783110167467 · Cited by 1,233
TOBI: a standard for labeling English prosody
Silverman, K. E. A., Beckman, M. E., Pitrelli, J. F., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C. W., Price, P. J., Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Hirschberg, J. (1992) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.1992-260 · Cited by 1,029
Gibbs, R. W., Cohen, P. R., Morgan, J. L., & Pollack, M. E. (1991) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422946 · Cited by 967
(1990) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3839.001.0001 · Cited by 901
Voice and Articulation Drillbook
Seashore, C. E. (1940) · Music Educators Journal · doi:10.2307/3388520 · Cited by 898
Papers in Laboratory Phonology
(1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511627736 · Cited by 849
The Original ToBi System and the Evolution of the ToBi Framework
Beckman, M. E., Hirschberg, J., & Shattuck‐Hufnagel, S. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0002 · Cited by 691
Voice and Articulation Drillbook. By Grant Fairbanks. Harper and Brothers, 1941. Cloth, 234 pp.
(1941) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1288/00005537-194112000-00007 · Cited by 667
Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2006
Bell, P., Burrows, T., & Taylor, P. (2006) · Cited by 507
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Barry, A. S. (2007). The form, function, and distribution of high rising intonation in Southern Californian and Southern British English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
- Hualde, 2002, From pitch-accent to stress-accent in Basque and the typology of accentual systems, Vol. 7, 547
- Van Leyden, K. (2004). Prosodic characteristics of Orkney and Shetland dialects. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands.
Cited by
Yim, W.-W., Fu, Y., Ben Abacha, A., Snider, N., Lin, T., & Yetisgen, M. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02487-3 · Cited by 64
“These and other factors may contribute to speech and language patterns 37 .”
BackgroundSpasmodic dysphonia: introductory phonetic analyses
Reid, E. W., & Nobriga, C. V. (2023) · Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics · doi:10.1080/02699206.2022.2096483 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Clopper, C. G., & Smiljanic, R.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clopper, Cynthia G.
- ORCID
- Clopper, Cynthia G.
- Venue
- Journal of Phonetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 237-245
- ISSN
- 0095-4470 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3113495
- OpenAlex
- W2043916758
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 18.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Phonetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Northwestern University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC005794, F32DC007237)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Keywords
- prosodic variation, regional dialects, American English, Southern American English, gender effects, pitch accent, pauses, speech rate, read speech
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
