Continuity of carer and partnership
Abstract
The purpose of this paper was to conduct a critical review of the literature to determine whether there is convincing evidence that continuity of carer is fundamental to midwives forming a partnership relationship with women. Electronic databases and text were searched. The research findings did not support the notion that continuity of carer was a high priority of the women nor was it found to be a clear predictor for women's satisfaction. Continuity of care throughout the childbirth experience was found to increase midwives job satisfaction and autonomy but did not necessarily lead to midwives developing meaningful relationships with women. The lack of research support for continuity of care may be a matter of lack of well-designed studies or it may be a real finding. Further research is required to determine whether continuity of carer is essential to the partnership relationship.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A critical review by Freeman found that the content of care was a higher priority for women than continuity of carer.
“A critical review by Freeman [16] found that the content of care was a higher priority for women than continuity of carer”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Freeman, L. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Freeman, Lesa M.
- Venue
- Women and Birth
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 39-44
- ISSN
- 1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040271423
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Women and Birth (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Keywords
- continuity of carer, midwife-patient relationship, childbirth experience, midwifery autonomy, women's satisfaction, continuity of care
- MeSH terms
- Australia, Continuity of Patient Care, Education, Nursing, Continuing, Female, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Midwifery, Nurse-Patient Relations, Pregnancy, Quality of Health Care, Nursing Evaluation Research, Patient Satisfaction, Patient-Centered Care, Nurse's Role
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review