Cited by 73Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The initial development of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale

Brunton, Robyn J., Dryer, Rachel, Saliba, Anthony, Kohlhoff, Jane·2019·Women and Birth

Abstract

Problem/background Pregnancy-related anxiety is a distinct anxiety characterised by pregnancy-specific concerns. This anxiety is consistently associated with adverse birth outcomes, and obstetric and paediatric risk factors, associations generally not seen with other anxieties. The need exists for a psychometrically sound scale for this anxiety type. This study, therefore, reports on the initial development of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale. Methods The item pool was developed following a literature review and the formulation of a definition for pregnancy-related anxiety. An Expert Review Panel reviewed the definition, item pool and test specifications. Pregnant women were recruited online (N=671). Results Using a subsample (N=262, M=27.94, SD=4.99), fourteen factors were extracted using Principal Components Analysis accounting for 63.18% of the variance. Further refinement resulted in 11 distinct factors. Confirmatory Factor Analysis further tested the model with a second subsample (N=369, M=26.59, SD=4.76). After additional refinement, the resulting model was a good fit with nine factors (childbirth, appearance, attitudes towards childbirth, motherhood, acceptance, anxiety, medical, avoidance, and baby concerns). Internal consistency reliability was good with the majority of subscales exceeding α=.80. Conclusions The Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale is easy to administer with higher scores indicative of greater pregnancy-related anxiety. The inclusion of reverse-scored…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.05.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 61 · Cited by 73

Authors
Brunton, R. J., Dryer, R., Saliba, A., & Kohlhoff, J.
Affiliations
  • Charles Sturt University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Brunton, Robyn J.
Venue
Women and Birth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
e118-e130
ISSN
1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2806825797
Cited by
73
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women and Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Charles Sturt University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
pregnancy-related anxiety, scale development, psychometric validation, motherhood, adverse birth outcomes, pregnant women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Psychometrics, Risk Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Parturition, Delivery, Obstetric, Pregnant People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review