Cited by 14COVID-19 Impact on ReproductionMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Pregnancy after loss during the COVID19 pandemic

Open access
Pollock, Danielle, Murphy, Margaret M., O’Leary, Joann, Warland, Jane·2020·Women and Birth

Abstract

Background Rapid changes to how maternity health care is delivered has occurred in many countries across the globe in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Maternity care provisions have been challenged attempting to balance the needs and safety of pregnant women and their care providers. Women experiencing a pregnancy after loss (PAL) during these times face particularly difficult circumstances.Aim In this paper we highlight the situation in three high income countries (Australia, Ireland and USA) and point to the need to remember the unique and challenging circumstances of these PAL families. We suggest new practices may be deviating from established evidence-based guidelines and outline the potential ramifications of these changes.Findings Recommendations for health care providers are suggested to bridge the gap between the necessary safety requirements due to the pandemic, the role of the health care provider, and the needs of families experiencing a pregnancy after loss.Discussion Changes to practices i.e. limiting the number of antenatal appointments and access to a support person may have detrimental effects on both mother, baby, and their family. However, new guidelines in maternity care practices developed to account for the pandemic have not necessarily considered women experiencing pregnancy after loss.Conclusion Bereaved mothers and their families experiencing a pregnancy after loss should continue to be supported during the COVID-19 pandemic to limit unintended consequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.07.011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 14

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]Knight M. Bunch K. Vousden N. Morris E. Simpson N. Gale C. Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women hospitalised with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the UK: a national cohort study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) medRxiv 2020 10.1101/2020.05.08.20089268 · DOI
  2. [20]Burnet Institute Rapid Review of Maternal Health Recommendations Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic available from 2020 burnet.edu.au/projects/435

Authors
Pollock, D., Murphy, M. M., O’Leary, J., & Warland, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Pollock, Danielle
Venue
Women and Birth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
540-543
ISSN
1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046315472
Cited by
14
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Women and Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
pregnancy after loss, COVID-19 pandemic, obstetric care, bereaved mothers, prenatal care, clinical guidelines, maternal mental health, Australia, Ireland
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Australia, Bereavement, Female, Humans, Ireland, Maternal Health Services, Mothers, Pneumonia, Viral, Pregnancy, United States, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Coronavirus Infections, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women, Stillbirth, Pandemics, Perinatal Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review