CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 64Social Policy and Reform StudiesSocial Policy and Social Work in BrazilHuman Rights and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Protection: Rethinking Rights and Duties

Ulriksen, Marianne S., Plagerson, Sophie·2014·World Development
DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Alexander, 2004, Capabilities, human rights and moral pluralism, International Journal of Human Rights, 8, 451, 10.1080/1364298042000283585 · DOI
  2. Ballet, 2007, Responsibility for each other’s freedom: Agency as the source of collective capability, Journal of Human Development, 8, 185, 10.1080/14649880701371000 · DOI
  3. Cornwall, 2005, Why rights, why now? Reflections on the rise of rights in international development discourse, IDS Bulletin, 36, 9, 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2005.tb00174.x · DOI
  4. Devereux, 2010, Social protection in Africa: Evidence, politics, and rights, Poverty & Public Policy, 2, 53, 10.2202/1944-2858.1078 · DOI
  5. Duflo, 2012, Lecture 1: Paternalism versus Freedom?, Tanner Lectures: Human values and the design of the fight against poverty
  6. Eggen, 2013, Making and shaping poor Malawians: Citizenship below the poverty line, Development Policy Review, 31, 697, 10.1111/dpr.12031 · DOI
  7. Ellis, 2012, “We Are All Poor Here”: Economic differences, social divisiveness and targeting cash transfers in Sub-Saharan Africa, Journal of Development Studies, 48, 201, 10.1080/00220388.2011.625408 · DOI
  8. Fitzpatrick, 2002, In Search of a welfare democracy, Social Policy and Society, 1, 11, 10.1017/S1474746402001033 · DOI
  9. Hick, 2012, The capability approach: Insights for a new poverty focus, Journal of Social Policy, 41, 291, 10.1017/S0047279411000845 · DOI
  10. Hickey, 2011, The politics of social protection: What do we get from a ‘social contract’ approach?, Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 32, 426, 10.1080/02255189.2011.647447 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hochfeld, 2011, Dignity and stigma among South African female cash transfer recipients, IDS Bulletin, 42, 53, 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00273.x · DOI
  12. Kabeer, 2005, Introduction, Vol. 1, 1
  13. Lund, F. (2009). Social Protection, Citizenship and the Employment Relationship. WIEGO Working Paper No. 10, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge.
  14. Nussbaum, 2011, Capabilities, entitlements, rights: Supplementation and critique, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12, 23, 10.1080/19452829.2011.541731 · DOI
  15. Nussbaum, 2003, Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice, Feminist Economics, 92, 33, 10.1080/1354570022000077926 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Onyx, 2012, Active citizenship: An empirical investigation, Social Policy and Society, 11, 55, 10.1017/S1474746411000406 · DOI
  17. Patel, L. (2007). A cross-national study on civic service and volunteering in Southern Africa. In Research Partnerships Build the Service Field in Africa: Special Issue on Civic Service in the Southern African Development Community, joint issue of The Social Work Practitioner-Researcher and Journal of Social Development in Africa, 7–23.
  18. Patel, L., Sadie, Y., Graham, V., Delany, A., & Baldry, K. (in press). Voting behaviour and the influence of social protection – A study of voting behaviour in three poor areas in South Africa. Johannesburg: Centre of Social Development in Africa, University of Johannesburg.
  19. Pettit, 2005, Developing rights? Relating discourse to context and practice, IDS Bulletin, 36, 1, 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2005.tb00173.x · DOI
  20. Plagerson, 2012, Cash transfers and citizenship: Evidence from South Africa, Journal of Development Studies, 48, 969, 10.1080/00220388.2012.658371 · DOI
  21. Plagerson, 2011, Does money matter for mental health? Evidence from the child support grants in Johannesburg, South Africa, Global Public Health, 6, 760, 10.1080/17441692.2010.516267 · DOI
  22. Robeyns, 2005, The capability approach: A theoretical survey, Journal of Human Development, 6, 93, 10.1080/146498805200034266 · DOI
  23. Sayer, 2012, Capabilities, contributive injustice and unequal divisions of labour, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13, 580, 10.1080/19452829.2012.693069 · DOI
  24. Sen, 2004, Elements of a theory of human rights, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32, 315, 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00017.x · DOI
  25. Turner, 2001, The erosion of citizenship, British Journal of Sociology, 52, 189, 10.1080/00071310120044944 · DOI
  26. UNDP, 2011, Vol. 18
  27. UNV (United Nations Volunteers) (2011). State of the World’s Volunteerism Report 2011. United Nations publication, printed in Denmark. · DOI
  28. Ulriksen, 2012, Questioning the pro-poor agenda: Examining the links between social protection and poverty, Development Policy Review, 30, 261, 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2012.00576.x · DOI
  29. Verhoeven, 2013, Talking active citizenship: Framing welfare state reform in England and the Netherlands, Social Policy and Society, 12, 415, 10.1017/S1474746413000158 · DOI
  30. Vizard, 2011, Introduction: The capability approach and human rights, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12, 1, 10.1080/19452829.2010.541728 · DOI
  31. White, 2000, Review article: Social rights and the social contract – Political theory and the new welfare politics, British Journal of Political Science, 30, 507, 10.1017/S0007123400000211 · DOI
  32. Yeates, 2011, Going global: The transnationalization of care, Development and Change, 42, 1109, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01718.x · DOI
  33. Yeates, 2002, Globalization and social policy: From global neoliberal hegemony to global political pluralism, Global Social Policy, 2, 69, 10.1177/1468018102002001095 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 64

Metadata

Authors
Ulriksen, M. S., & Plagerson, S.
Affiliations
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
ORCID
Venue
World Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
64
Pages
755-765
ISSN
0305-750X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.009
OpenAlex
W2109683413
Cited by
64
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
18.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • World Development (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policy and Social Work in Brazil
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Human Rights and Development
Keywords
social protection, rights and obligations, citizenship theory, solidarity, civic agency, duty bearers, conditional cash transfers, social rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Protection: Rethinking Rights and Duties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.009
The paper
Ulriksen, M. S., & Plagerson, S. (2014). Social Protection: Rethinking Rights and Duties. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.07.009