Green economy, degradation narratives, and land-use conflicts in Tanzania
Open accessAbstract
The implementation of the green economy in Tanzania is currently re-arranging space in significant ways. The Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania (SAGCOT) has been presented by the government as well as investors and aid donors as a model for the green economy in Africa combining investments in large-scale farming with environmental conservation. The Kilombero valley is centrally situated within SAGCOT and has become a national hotspot of land-use conflicts. The valley is dominated by an expanding sector of agricultural capital investments combined with a substantial increase in areas under environmental conservation. While some smallholder farmers are dispossessed through these expansions, others are contracted as outgrowers. Pastoralists are, however, only in the way, and are also thought to cause widespread environmental degradation. This is a long-held view, which also plays a key role in the implementation of SAGCOT. It has led to a series of pastoral evictions in the country. In 2012, ‘Operation Save Kilombero’ was implemented consisting of violent evictions of all pastoralists from the valley. This eviction had been planned to conserve the wetland ecosystem that was seen by the government and aid donors to be threatened by pastoral overstocking. The arrival of the green economy in Kilombero re-enforced the perceived need to clear the valley of livestock and pastoralists to conserve the environment and make space for investments in agriculture. The pastoral eviction in Kilombero in 2012 was also only one in a series; every eviction leading to the spill-over of pastoralists to other areas creating new farmer-herder conflicts as well as conservation conflicts. While land-use conflicts in Africa are commonly thought to be caused by natural resource scarcity and environmental degradation mainly resulting from population growth, we demonstrate how degradation narratives may themselves be a key driver of conflicts, in this case to legitimize and pave the way for agricultural investments and environmental conservation under a ‘green economy’.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sparse literature on connections between climate adaptation and mitigation projects and local security points to a potential for an increase rather than decrease in local tensions in some contexts, notably related to access and use of land.
“The sparse literature on connections between climate adaptation and mitigation projects and local security points to a potential for an increase rather than decrease in local tensions in some contexts, notably related to access and use of land (190)(191)(192).”
From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [190]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 97 · Cited by 135
- Authors
- Bergius, M., Benjaminsen, T. A., Maganga, F., & Buhaug, H.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
- St. John's University of Tanzania (TZ)
- Peace Research Institute Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Bergius, Mikael
- Venue
- World Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 129
- Pages
- 104850
- ISSN
- 0305-750X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000565470
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 29.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- World Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Research Council of Norway
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
- Keywords
- green economy, land use conflicts, Kilombero Valley, farmer-herder conflict, conservation conflicts, large-scale farming, wetland conservation, environmental protection, Tanzania
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review