The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A sustainable livelihoods framework for the 21st century
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes a reformulation of the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework (SLF) fit for the 21st century. The article explores the rise and usage of the original SLF, highlighting how its popularity among development practitioners emerged both from its practical focus, and its depoliticization of wider shifts in the development landscape at the time. Distilling the various critiques that have emerged around the use of the SLF and sustainable livelihoods approaches, the article highlights problems of theory, method, scale, historical conceptualisation, politics, and debates on decolonising knowledge. It further explores two key shifts in the global development landscape that characterise the 21st century, namely the impacts of climate change on rural livelihoods, and the shifts wrought by globalisation, before highlighting the structural and relational turns in critical development literature. In speaking to both historical critiques and more recent debates, we present a SLF for the 21st century, foregrounding a structural, spatially-disaggregated, dynamic and ecologically-coherent approach to framing rural livelihoods. We offer a framework and not an approach, hoping that that our SLF leaves open the possibility for different theoretical traditions to better work with emerging rural livelihoods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
Crawford, T. H. (. H. (1994) · Configurations · doi:10.1353/con.1994.0041 · Cited by 7,931
Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-5764 · Cited by 5,461
Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis.
Parsons, H. L., & Giddens, A. (1980) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2107414 · Cited by 4,926
Sugden, R., & Sen, A. (1986) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232999 · Cited by 4,031
Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries
Ellis, F. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198296959.001.0001 · Cited by 3,999
Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene
McKeithen, W. (2017) · Gender, Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2017.1336302 · Cited by 3,961
Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-6234 · Cited by 3,677
Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene
Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C. P., Barnosky, A. D., Cornell, S. E., Crucifix, M., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1810141115 · Cited by 3,139
Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis
Scoones, I. (1998) · OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) · Cited by 3,099
Metadata
- Authors
- Natarajan, N., Newsham, A., Rigg, J., & Suhardiman, D.
- Venue
- World Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 155
- Pages
- 105898
- ISSN
- 0305-750X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4280547040
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 175.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A sustainable livelihoods framework for the 21st century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105898
- The paper
- Natarajan, N., Newsham, A., Rigg, J., & Suhardiman, D. (2022). A sustainable livelihoods framework for the 21st century. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105898
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.