Cited by 128Mental Health and PsychiatryMental Health Research TopicsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Prototype Diagnosis of Psychiatric Syndromes

Open access
WESTEN, DREW·2012·World Psychiatry

Abstract

The method of diagnosing patients used since the early 1980s in psychiatry, which involves evaluating each of several hundred symptoms for their presence or absence and then applying idiosyncratic rules for combining them for each of several hundred disorders, has led to great advances in research over the last 30 years. However, its problems have become increasingly apparent, particularly for clinical practice. An alternative approach, designed to maximize clinical utility, is prototype matching. Instead of counting symptoms of a disorder and determining whether they cross an arbitrary cutoff, the task of the diagnostician is to gauge the extent to which a patient's clinical presentation matches a paragraph-length description of the disorder using a simple 5-point scale, from 1 ("little or no match") to 5 ("very good match"). The result is both a dimensional diagnosis that captures the extent to which the patient "has" the disorder and a categorical diagnosis, with ratings of 4 and 5 corresponding to presence of the disorder and a rating of 3 indicating "subthreshold" or "clinically significant features". The disorders and criteria woven into the prototypes can be identified empirically, so that the prototypes are both scientifically grounded and clinically useful. Prototype diagnosis has a number of advantages: it better captures the way humans naturally classify novel and complex stimuli; is clinically helpful, reliable, and easy to use in everyday practice; facilitates both dimensional and categorical diagnosis and dramatically reduces the number of categories required for classification; allows for clinically richer, empirically derived, and culturally relevant classification; reduces the gap between research criteria and clinical knowledge, by allowing clinicians in training to learn a small set of standardized prototypes and to develop richer mental representations of the disorders over time through clinical experience; and can help resolve the thorny issue of the relation between psychiatric diagnosis and functional impairment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.01.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The wide range of symptoms and behaviors, accompanied by different severity and combination levels, complicates diagnosis.

    “The wide range of symptoms and behaviors, accompanied by different severity and combination levels, complicates diagnosis [131,132].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 128

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [1]1. Maj M. Psychiatric diagnosis: pros and cons of prototypes vs. operational criteria. World Psychiatry 2011;10:81-2.
  2. [3]3. Westen D, Novotny CM, Thompson-Brenner H. The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychol Bull 2004;130:631-63.
  3. [4]4. Westen D, Bradley R. Prototype diagnosis of personality. In: Strack S (ed). Handbook of personology and psychopathology. New York: Wiley, 2005:238-56.
  4. [5]5. Westen D, Heim A, Morrison K et al. Simplifying diagnosis using a prototype-matching approach: implications for the next edition of the DSM. In: Beutler LE, Malik ML (eds). Rethinking the DSM: a psychological perspective. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2002:221-50.
  5. [6]6. Westen D, Shedler J. A prototype matching approach to diagnosing personality disorders: toward DSM-V . J Pers Disord 2000;14:109-26.
  6. [7]7. Westen D, Shedler J, Bradley R. A prototype approach to personality disorder diagnosis. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163:846-56.
  7. [10]10. DeFife JA, Westen D, Bradley B et al. Prototype personality diagnosis in clinical practice: a viable alternative for DSM-5 and ICD-11. Prof Psychol Res Pr 2010;41:482-7.
  8. [11]11. Widiger T, Frances A. The DSM-III personality disorders: perspectives from psychology. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985;42:615-23.
  9. [12]12. Reed GM, Correia JM, Esparza P et al. The WPA-WHO global survey of psychiatrists' attitudes towards mental disorders classification. World Psychiatry 2011;10:118-31.
  10. [14]14. Folstein JR, Van Petten C. Multidimension- al rule, unidimensional rule, and similarity strategies in categorization: event-related brain potential correlates. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2004;30:1026-44.
  11. [15]15. Medin DL. Concepts and conceptual structure. Am Psychol 1989;44:1469-81.
  12. [16]16. Rosch E, Mervis CB. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cogn Psychol 1975;7:573-605.
  13. [17]17. Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychol Rev1996;103:650-69.
  14. [18]18. Gigerenzer G. Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious. New York: Penguin Group, 2008.
  15. [20]20. Fava GA, Mangelli L. Assessment of subclinical symptoms and psychological wellbeing in depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001;251:47-52.
  16. [21]21. Marshall RD, Olfson M, Hellman F et al. Comorbidity, impairment, and suicidality in subthreshold PTSD. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:1467-73.
  17. [22]22. Spitzer RL, Endicott J, Robins E. Research Diagnostic Criteria: rationale and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978;35:773-82.
  18. [23]23. Rottman B, Ahn W, Sanislow C et al. Can clinicians recognize DSM-IV personality disorders from five-factor model descriptions of patient cases? Am J Psychiatry 2009;166:427-33.
  19. [24]24. Spitzer R, First M, Shedler J et al. Clinical utility of five dimensional systems for personality diagnosis: a 'consumer preference' study. J Nerv Ment Dis 2008;196:356-74.
  20. [25]25. Westen D, Muderrisoglu S. Reliability and validity of personality disorder assessment using a systematic clinical interview: evaluating an alternative to structured interviews. J Pers Disord 2003;17:350-68.
  21. [26]26. Westen D, Shedler J. Revising and assessing Axis II, Part 2: toward an empirically based and clinically useful classification of personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:273-85.
  22. [27]27. Kim NS, Ahn W. Clinical psychologists' theory-based representations of mental disorders predict their diagnostic reasoning and memory. J Exper Psychol 2002;131:451-76.
  23. [29]29. Ahn W . Effect of causal structure on category construction. Memory & Cognition 1999;27:1008-23.

Authors
WESTEN, D.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
WESTEN, DREW
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
16-21
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W2038781825
Cited by
128
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
136.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH078100, R01MH062377)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
prototype matching, psychiatric diagnosis, dimensional diagnosis, categorical diagnosis, symptom-based diagnosis, subthreshold symptoms, clinical utility, psychiatric classification, functional disability, clinician training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review