Cited by 39Environmental Impact and SustainabilityWater-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesWater resources management and optimization

“Quantifying spatiotemporal impacts of the interaction of water scarcity and water use by the global semiconductor manufacturing industry”

Open access
Frost, Kali, Hua, Inez·2019·Water Resources and Industry

Abstract

The high-tech semiconductor manufacturing sector is integral to the international electronics industry and was valued at over $400 billion USD in 2017. Intensive water use by this industry is well-documented and this work provides a spatially explicitly assessment of water use impacts by nearly 100% of global semiconductor manufacturing capacity. Both direct manufacturing water use and water use from electricity were considered as part of a facility’s total withdrawal. Manufacturing water withdrawals were estimated by using technology-specific water and electricity use data, reported at the semiconductor chip or wafer level from the life cycle literature and industry estimates. Electricity water use intensity (WUI) factors were gleaned from the literature and regional electricity WUI factors were derived for China and the U.S. Geolocation of semiconductor manufacturing facilities allowed for summation of water withdrawals at various spatial extents (i.e. watershed, country, and globally). This data was combined with calculated regional or country-level electricity water use factors to estimate total water withdrawals by a facility. Geolocation of data also allowed for calculation of watershed specific scarcity-weighted withdrawals. Scarcity-weighted withdrawals were ascertained by multiplying facility water withdrawal data by the AWaRE water scarcity characterization factor available for each of 202 watersheds associated with semiconductor manufacturing facilities. These data…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wri.2019.100115

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI chip and server manufacturing uses a huge amount of water.

    “AI chip and server manufacturing uses a huge amount of water.7,28”

    From Making AI Less 'Thirsty' (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

  • Scope-3 water usage is likely significant.

    “Although largely obscure, scope-3 water usage is likely significant.7”

    From Making AI Less 'Thirsty' (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frost, K., & Hua, I.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Hua, Inez
Venue
Water Resources and Industry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
22
Pages
100115
ISSN
2212-3717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2968782233
Cited by
39
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Water Resources and Industry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Purdue University
  • National Science Foundation (1144843, 1542418)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Water resources management and optimization
Keywords
semiconductor manufacturing, industrial water use, water scarcity, water abstraction, supply chain sourcing, water-saving technologies, water use coefficients, China, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review