CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Assessment of physicochemical properties of water and their seasonal variation in an urban river in Bangladesh

Rahman, Arafat, Jahanara, Ishrat, Jolly, Yeasmin Nahar·2021·Water Science and Engineering
DOI 10.1016/j.wse.2021.06.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wse.2021.06.006

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Map of study area and sampling sites in Turag River.
Fig. 1 Map of study area and sampling sites in Turag River.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Temporal variation of physicochemical properties of water in Turag River from December 2018 (month 1) to November 2019 (month 12).
Fig. 2 Temporal variation of physicochemical properties of water in Turag River from December 2018 (month 1) to November 2019 (month 12).CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Dendrogram using hierarchical clustering of sampling months of water collection.
Fig. 3 Dendrogram using hierarchical clustering of sampling months of water collection.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Afrin, 2015, Status of water pollution in respect of physicochemical parameters and anions in the Turag River of Bangladesh, Bangladesh J. Environ. Sci., 28, 113
  2. Ahmed, 2016, Assessment on the level of contamination of Turag River at Tongi area in Dhaka, Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res., 51, 193, 10.3329/bjsir.v51i3.29431 · DOI
  3. Aktar, 2017, Assessment of water quality status of Turag River due to industrial effluent, Int. J. Eng. Inform. Syst., 1, 105
  4. Banu, 2013, Contamination and ecological risk assessment of heavy metal in the sediment of Turag River, Bangladesh: An index analysis approach, J. Water Resour. Protect., 5, 239, 10.4236/jwarp.2013.52024 · DOI
  5. Barakat, 2016, Assessment of spatial and seasonal water quality variation of Oum Er Rbia River (Morocco) using multivariate statistical techniques, Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res., 4, 284, 10.1016/j.iswcr.2016.11.002 · DOI
  6. Bhuiyan, 2011, Surface water quality assessment in the central part of Bangladesh using multivariate analysis, KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 15, 995, 10.1007/s12205-011-1079-y · DOI
  7. Brar, 2017, Photoautotrophic microorganisms and bioremediation of industrial effluents: Current status and future prospects, Biotech, 7, 18
  8. Dewan, 2012, Dynamics of land use/cover changes and the analysis of landscape fragmentation in Dhaka Metroploitan, Bangladesh, GeoJournal, 77, 315, 10.1007/s10708-010-9399-x · DOI
  9. Hafizur, 2017, Investigation of physicochemical parameters, heavy metals in Turag River water and adjacent industrial effluent in Bangladesh, J. Sci. Technol. Environ. Inform., 5, 347, 10.18801/jstei.050117.37 · DOI
  10. Hasan, 2019, Water pollution in Bangladesh and its impact on public health, Heliyon, 5, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02145 · DOI
  11. Hossain, 2012, Present status of water quality of the Bangshi River, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Bangladesh J. Environ. Res., 10, 17
  12. Islam, 2018, Hydro-environmental pollution of Turag River in Bangladesh, Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res., 53, 161, 10.3329/bjsir.v53i3.38261 · DOI
  13. Islam, 2013, Effects of solid waste and industrial effluents on water quality of Turag River at Konabari industrial area, Gazipur, Bangladesh, J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour., 5, 213
  14. Islam, 2015, Alteration of water pollution level with the seasonal changes in mean daily discharge in three main rivers around Dhaka City, Bangladesh, Environments, 2, 280, 10.3390/environments2030280 · DOI
  15. Islam, 2019, Investigation of surface water quality of the Buriganga River Bangladesh: Laboratory and spatial analysis approaches, Dhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci., 28, 147, 10.3329/dujbs.v28i2.46501 · DOI
  16. Jin, 2020, Mitigation of impact of a major benzene spill into a river through flow control and in-situ activated carbon absorption, Water Res., 172, 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115489 · DOI
  17. Jin, 2020, Response of sediments and phosphorus to catchment characteristics and human activities under different rainfall patterns with Bayesian Networks, J. Hydrol., 584, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124695 · DOI
  18. Jirka, 1975, USEPA reactor digestion method for COD analysis, Anal. Chem., 47, 1397, 10.1021/ac60358a004 · DOI
  19. Jolly, 2018, Appraisal of metal pollution in the aquatic environment of Shitalakhya River, Bangladesh and its ecological risk assessment, J. Nat. Sci. Sustain. Technol., 12, 289
  20. Kant, 2012, Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard, Nat. Sci., 4, 22
  21. Klein, 1979, Graphical method for calculating biochemical oxygen demand, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 51, 2257
  22. Machender, 2013, Hydrogeochemical characteristics of surface water (SW) and groundwater (GW) of the Chinnaeru River Basin, northern part of Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh, India, Environ. Earth Sci., 71, 2885, 10.1007/s12665-013-2665-8 · DOI
  23. Moniruzzaman, 2009, Study on temporal variation of physicochemical parameters of Buriganga River water through GIS (Geographical Information System) technology, Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res., 44, 327, 10.3329/bjsir.v44i3.4406 · DOI
  24. Parker, 1992, Waterfowl distribution relative to freshwater wetland acidity, J. Wildl. Manag., 56, 268, 10.2307/3808822 · DOI
  25. Sarkar, 2016, Pollution and ecological risk assessment for the environmentally impacted Turag River. Bangladesh, J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 7, 2295
  26. Sayed, 2016, Evaluation of flooding risk in greater Dhaka District using satellite data and geomorphological land classification map, J. Geosci. Environ. Protect., 4, 110, 10.4236/gep.2016.49009 · DOI
  27. Tahmina, 2018, Assessment of surface water quality of the Turag River in Bangladesh, Res. J. Chem. Environ., 22, 49
  28. Uddin, 2021, Urban river pollution in Bangladesh during last 40 years: Potential public health and ecological risk, present policy, and future prospects toward smart water management, Heliyon, 7, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06107 · DOI
  29. Vega, 1998, Assessment of seasonal and polluting effects on the quality of river water by exploratory data analysis, Water Res., 32, 3581, 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00138-9 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Whitehead, 2009, A review of the potential impacts of climate change on surface water quality, Hydrol. Sci. J., 54, 101, 10.1623/hysj.54.1.101 · DOI
  31. Whitehead, 2018, Restoring water quality in the polluted Turag-Tongi-Balu river system, Dhaka: Modelling nutrient and total coliform intervention strategies, Sci. Total Environ., 631–632, 223, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.038 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rahman, A., Jahanara, I., & Jolly, Y. N.
Venue
Water Science and Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
139-148
ISSN
1674-2370
DOI
10.1016/j.wse.2021.06.006
Cited by
168
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review