Cited by 9Feminism, Gender, and IntersectionalityEcocriticism and Environmental LiteraturePosthumanist Ethics and Activism

Untangling the double bind of carework in green motherhood: An ecofeminist developmental path forward

Open access
Davis, Allison C.·2023·Women's Studies International Forum

Abstract

“Green motherhood” describes the rise of a predominant form of mothering ideology in Western culture that emphasizes environmental values and an ecoconscious lifestyle as a central part of mother work (AbiGhannam & Atkinson, 2016; Atkinson, 2014; Ray, 2011). Within this ideology, mothers experience a “double bind” regarding their environmental carework (Atkinson, 2014, p. 554) or the efforts they take to make sure the environment is safe and nurturing for their children. Green mothering as a practice emphasizes an individualized, consumption-based maternal identity and gendered, human-centered advocacy as a solution to environmental degradation. Mothers are charged with more responsibility to save the earth but pushed towards solutions that only hurt the planet and the future generations that rely on healthy mothers and a habitable earth. In this way, green motherhood represents a distortion of the psychoecological growth possible in matrescence, the developmental period of motherhood (Athan & Reel, 2015; Raphael, 1973). The goal of this paper is, therefore, to offer an ecofeminist psychoecological approach to carework that illuminates an alternative to the double bind through a “deep” and “warm” relationship between humans and nonhumans. To that end, I outline the principles of an ecofeminist developmental approach that connects maternal and planetary wellness and apply this lens to shift carework from environmental to ecological. In untangling the double bind mothers might be better able to move beyond this distortion of their psychoecological growth for their own health and the health of their human and nonhuman ecosystem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102730

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Climate change may drive mothers to adopt environmentally conscious behaviors and an attitudinal shift from anthropocentric to ecocentric.

    “Ecological. Climate change may drive mothers to adopt environmentally conscious behaviors, ranging from recycling to engaging in political protests (44–46). They may also report an attitudinal shift, from anthropocentric to ecocentric, developing an aversion to overconsumption and a desire for a deeper connection with nature and all living beings in a reciprocal relationship (47).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, A. C.
Corresponding author
Davis, Allison C.
Venue
Women's Studies International Forum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
98
Pages
102730
ISSN
0277-5395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4366980153
Cited by
9
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Women s Studies International Forum (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Keywords
ecofeminism, care work, double bind, matrescence, maternal identity, human-nonhuman relations, maternal health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review